Showing posts with label overtime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label overtime. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Agricultural Law in the Spotlight: The Fair Labor Standards Act


Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney

Agricultural producers face numerous complex federal and state agricultural labor laws.  Unfortunately, failure to comply with these laws could result in costly sanctions.  To assist interested individuals to better understand an agricultural producer’s labor legal obligations, the Penn State Center for Agricultural and Shale Law is publishing a series of Spotlight articles addressing key farm labor issues.  The first article in the series covers an agricultural producer’s legal obligations under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Fair Labor Standards Act
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) sets the federal standards for overtime pay, minimum wage, and child labor.  FLSA requires an employment relationship and is not applicable to independent contractors.  Nevertheless, even if an employment relationship does exist, FLSA may provide an agricultural employer with an exemption to the law’s requirements.

Employee or Independent Contractor
Because FLSA applies only where an employment relationship exists, an agricultural producer must first determine whether a given worker is an employee or an independent contractor.  Courts have ruled that a worker is generally considered to be an employee of someone who has the right to control the worker’s behavior regarding the work that will be done.  This right to control a worker’s behavior can be demonstrated through instructions, training, and financial aspects of the job being performed.  Such instructions could be telling a worker when, where, and how to work; providing the tools and equipment that are to be used; and assigning the order in which tasks are to be performed.  Additionally, employers often train workers to perform tasks in a certain way, while independent contractors ordinarily use their own methods.  Finally, an employee is generally paid a wage based on an hourly, weekly, or monthly basis.  An independent contractor, however, is generally paid according to a flat fee or based upon time and material.

Coverage
A business or worker is subject to FLSA if either the enterprise coverage or the individual coverage applies.  Under the enterprise coverage, FLSA applies to all businesses that have at least two employees and at least $500,000 a year in gross receipts.  Under the individual coverage, FLSA applies to workers who are engaged in interstate commerce, in the production of goods for commerce, or in any closely-related process or occupation directly essential to such production.  As a practical matter, nearly all agricultural employment will fall under one of the two types of FLSA coverage, but as described below, many agricultural employers are exempt from some of the law’s requirements.

FLSA Definition of Agriculture
An employee covered by FLSA may fall under one of the agricultural exemptions provided by the statute.  For an agricultural exemption to apply, a worker must be performing agricultural work. 

FLSA defines agriculture as farming and all its branches.  Agriculture also is defined to include any practices which are performed either by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with a farming operation.  Things to consider when determining whether an activity is incident to or in conjunction with a farming operation include the following:
  • Whether the activity is an established part of agriculture;
  • Whether the activity is subordinate to the farming operation;
  • Whether the activity is an independent business; and
  • Whether the activity is ordinarily performed by farmers incidentally to their farming operations. 

When assessing whether an activity is ordinarily performed by farmers incidentally to their farming operations, an employer must look at the proportion of other farmers producing the same commodity who also perform the activity.  For example, a farmer who wants to demonstrate that the processing of milk into yogurt meets the definition of agriculture must consider how many dairy farmers, among all dairy farmers, also engage in the activity of processing their milk into yogurt.

Overtime Pay
Employees covered by FLSA generally must receive overtime pay of at least time and one-half of their regular rate of pay for hours worked over 40 in a workweek.  FLSA, however, contains an agricultural exemption for overtime pay.  Under FLSA, workers employed solely in agriculture are not entitled to overtime pay.

Even with the application of FLSA’s agricultural exemption for overtime pay, employers must still check with state overtime laws to see if an agricultural exemption exists.  For example, under Pennsylvania law, labor on a farm is exempt from Pennsylvania overtime requirements.  In California, however, overtime pay is required for agricultural employees working over 10 hours in a day or over 60 hours in a week.

Minimum Wage
Employees covered by FLSA generally must be paid a federal minimum wage rate of $7.25 per hour.  The minimum wage rate must be paid regardless of whether the method of payment is hourly, salary, or piece rate.  FLSA, however, contains a partial exemption applicable to agriculture.  Under FLSA, agricultural employees are not entitled to minimum wage if one of the below-listed FLSA agricultural exemptions applies:
  • The worker is an immediate family member of their employer (An immediate family member is limited to a parent, spouse, child, step-child, foster child, step-parent, and foster parent);
  • The agriculture employer did not utilize more than 500 “man days” of agricultural labor in any calendar quarter of the preceding calendar year (A “man day” is any day during which an employee performs agricultural work for at least one hour);
  • The worker is principally engaged in the range production of livestock;
  • The worker is a local hand harvest laborer who commutes daily from his/her permanent residence, is paid on a piece-rate basis in traditional piece-rated occupations, and was engaged in agriculture fewer than 13 weeks during the preceding calendar year; or
  • The worker is a non-local minor, 16 years of age or under, who is a hand harvester, is paid on a piece-rate basis in a traditional piece-rated occupation, is employed on the same farm as his/her parent and is paid the same piece-rate as those over 16. 

Even when a FLSA agriculture exemption to the federal minimum wage applies, employers must always check state laws to see if the agricultural labor is subject to the state minimum wage.  For example, under Pennsylvania law, labor on a farm is exempt from the state’s minimum wage rate of $7.25 per hour.  If, however, the employee is classified under Pennsylvania law as a seasonal farm worker, the employee must be paid at least the statutory minimum wage or a piece-rate equivalent.

Child Labor
Anyone under the age of 18 years is legally considered to be a minor.  Unless an exemption applies, FLSA sets the minimum age for employment in hazardous occupations at 18 years of age and the minimum age for employment in non-hazardous occupations at 16 years of age.  Additionally, minors who are at least 14 years of age may be employed in certain limited occupations that carry restrictions on hours and work conditions.  FLSA, however, does provide an exemption for minors employed in agriculture

FLSA establishes the following minimum age requirements for minors employed in agricultural occupations:
  • Regardless of age, if a minor is employed by a parent on a farm owned or operated by the parent, the minor may work without any restriction;
  • Minors who are 16 years of age may work in any agricultural job, whether hazardous or not, with no work hour restrictions;
  • Minors who are 14 or 15 years old may work outside of school hours in any non-hazardous agricultural job;
  • Minors who are 12 or 13 years old may work outside of school hours in any non-hazardous agricultural job at the farm where their parent works or with written parental consent; and
  • Minors who are under 12 years old, with written parental consent, may work outside of school hours in any non-hazardous agricultural job on a small farm that is exempt from the federal minimum wage provisions. 

While FLSA may provide hour and hazard exemptions for minors that work on a family farm or for any minor 16 years or older, agricultural employers must still look to other laws to see if the minor is permitted to engage in a specific activity.  For example, FLSA would not prevent a 17-year-old from operating a forklift on a farm.  Under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, however, it is a violation of federal law for anyone under 18 years of age to operate a forklift.

Conclusion
Agricultural employers must always be aware of FLSA requirements establishing federal standards for overtime pay, minimum wage, and child labor.  FLSA does provide agricultural exemptions that may be applicable depending upon the nature of the farm and the type of work that is being performed.  For an agricultural exemption to apply, a worker’s employment activity must meet FLSA’s definition of agriculture.  Finally, agricultural employers must be mindful that even if exempted under FLSA, other federal and state laws may still apply.

References
29 USC Ch. 8: FAIR LABOR STANDARDS

U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fair Labor Standards Act in Agriculture: https://www.dol.gov/whd/ag/ag_flsa.htm

U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fact Sheet #12: Agricultural Employers Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs12.htm

U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Fact Sheet #40: Overview of Youth Employment (Child Labor) Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for Agricultural Occupations:

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 1, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Labor: Court Blocks New Overtime Regulations
On November 22, 2016, the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas granted an Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction enjoining the Department of Labor from implementing and enforcing the Overtime Final Rule scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2016 (State of Nevada ET AL v. United States Department of Labor ET AL No: 4:16-CV-00731).  According to the court, the preliminary injunction was issued because “[t]he State Plaintiffs have established a prima facie case that the Department’s salary level under the Final Rule and the automatic updating mechanism are without statutory authority.” If permitted to go into effect, the new rule would have increased the number of “white collar” workers eligible for overtime pay.

Labeling: FDA Announces Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations
On November 25, 2016, the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register that the agency “is establishing January 1, 2020, as the uniform compliance date for food labeling regulations that are issued between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018” (81 FR 85156).  According to FDA, the agency coordinates and periodically announces the effective dates of labeling changes to lessen “the cumulative economic impact on the food industry of having to respond separately to each change.”

Pesticides: Court Dismisses Beekeeper Complaint
On November 21, 2016, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a complaint brought by beekeepers and environmentalist to compel the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to restrict the use of seeds treated with neonicotinoid insecticides (Anderson v. EPA, Case No. 3:16-cv-00068-WHA).  According to the Plaintiffs, EPA allegedly failed “to enforce the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act with respect to such seeds.” In dismissing the complaint, the court stated that “[t]he court is most sympathetic to the plight of our bee population and beekeepers…[and] [p]erhaps the EPA should have done more to protect them, but such policy decisions are for the agency to make.”

Spotted Lanternfly: PDA Announces Addendum to the Order of Quarantine
On November 26, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin of an Addendum to the Order of Quarantine published at 44 Pa.B. 6947 issued Saturday, November 1, 2014 regarding the spotted lanternfly (46 Pa.B. 7449).  According to PDA, the spotted lanternfly is considered a “dangerous insect to forests, ornamental trees, orchards and grapes…[and as a result] [a] quarantine is hereby established with respect to Union Township, Ruscombmanor Township, Richmond Township, Maiden Creek Township, Fleetwood Borough, Robeson Township, Centre Township, Centreport Borough, Birdsboro Borough in Berks County, Quakertown Borough, Richland Township, Richlandtown Borough in Bucks County, North Coventry Township, Spring City Borough, East Coventry Township, East Vincent Township in Chester County, Bethlehem City in Lehigh County, Bethlehem City in Northampton County, and Lower Fredrick Township, Pottstown Borough, Royersford Borough, Limerick Township, Upper Providence Township, Upper Pottsgrove Township, Upper Salford Township in Montgomery County.”

Food Safety: UK Establishes Food Crime Reporting Facility
On November 28, 2016, the United Kingdom’s (UK) Food Safety Agency’s (FSA’s) National Food Crime Unit (NFCU) issued a press release announcing the availability of the Food Crime Confidential reporting facility which now enables “anyone with suspicions about food crime [to] report them safely and in confidence, over the phone or through email.” According to the press release, “[f]ood crime involves dishonesty at any stage in the production or supply of food.” As a result, NFCU works with partners to protect people from serious criminal activity that impacts the safety or authenticity of food and drink they consume…[and the Food Crime Confidential] facility is particularly targeted at those working in or around the UK food industry.” 

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks
Recent AgLaw HotLinks include:

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the Friday Recap which details all our publications and activities from the week.


Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—September 15, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Labor: California Governor Signs Bill Removing Agricultural Worker Overtime Exemption
On September 12, 2016, California Governor Edmund G. (“Jerry”) Brown signed into law legislation removing California’s agricultural worker overtime exemption (AB 1066).  Prior to the enactment of AB 1066, California agricultural workers only received overtime pay if they worked more than 10 hours a day or 60 hours per week.  Now, however, agricultural workers must receive overtime pay if they work in excess of 8 hours a day or 40 hours per week.  The new law will phase in the new overtime requirements for agricultural worker over the course of 4 years, though agricultural producers with 25 or fewer employees will be given an additional 3 years to phase in the overtime requirements.

Trade: U.S. Brings WTO Action against China for Rice, Wheat, and Corn Support  
On September 13, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a press release stating that “the Obama Administration has launched a new trade enforcement action against the People's Republic of China at the World Trade Organization (WTO) concerning excessive government support provided for Chinese production of rice, wheat, and corn.” According to USDA, China’s excessive government support violates WTO rules, have caused an inflation of prices above market levels, and have denied American rice, wheat, and corn farmers the ability to compete on a level playing field.

Litigation: Court Rules EPA’s Release of CAFO Information Violated FOIA
On September 9, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) when EPA released personal information pertaining to owners of concentrated feeding operations (American Farm Bureau Federation v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Case No. 15-1234).  The court remanded the case back to the district court to consider American Farm Bureau Federation’s request for injunctive relief. 

FSMA: States to Receive $21.8 Million to Farmers Comply with Produce Rule
On September 9, 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release announcing that the agency was “awarding…$21.8 million to support 42 states in the implementation of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) produce safety rule.” According to FDA, the state “[a]pplicants were classified into five tiers of funding eligibility based on the estimated number of farms growing covered produce within their jurisdiction.” FDA stated that the funding is available for five years, subject to the availability of funding from Congress.

Quarantine: PDA Establishes Quarantine for Spotted Lanternfly
On September 10, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin of an Addendum to the Order of Quarantine regarding the Spotted Lanternfly (46 Pa.B. 5814).  According to PDA, “[a] quarantine is hereby established with respect to Lyons Borough, Alsace Township, Exeter Township, St. Lawrence Borough, Berks County and Upper Macungie Township, Lehigh County and West Pottsgrove, Montgomery County.” PDA stated that “[t]his is in addition to, and does not replace, any townships and areas already subject to the Spotted Lanternfly Quarantine Order published at 44 Pa.B. 6947 issued Saturday, November 1, 2014, and any previous Addendums to that Quarantine Order.”

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—September 1, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Big Data: DOJ Sues to Prevent Deere’s Acquisition of Precision Planting  
On August 31, 2016, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) brought an anti-trust action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division to prevent Deere & Company’s (Deere) from acquiring Precision Planting LLC (Precision Planting), a subsidiary of Monsanto Company (U.S.Department of Justice v. Deere & Co., Case No. 1:16-cv-08515).  According to the filed complaint, Deere and Precision Planting currently account for 86% of all high-speed precision planting system sales in the United States and as a result, DOJ asserted “the proposed acquisition likely would lessen competition substantially, and tend to create a monopoly…in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.”

Labor: California Governor Presented with Bill Removing Agricultural Worker Overtime Exemption
On August 30, 2016, California Governor Edmund G. (“Jerry”) Brown was presented with legislation which would require California agricultural producers to pay overtime to agricultural employees (AB 1066).  If signed by the Governor, AB 1066 “would remove the exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers…over the course of 4 years.” The proposed legislation would also allow agricultural producers with 25 or fewer employees an additional 3 years to phase in the overtime requirements.  

HPAI: Avian Influenza Found in Wild Duck in Alaska
On August 26, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) “confirmed the presence of highly pathogenic H5N2 avian influenza (HPAI) in a wild mallard duck from a state wildlife refuge near Fairbanks, Alaska.”  According to APHIS, this recent discover is the first reported case of H5N5 HPAI—in either wild or commercial birds—in the United States since June 2015. 

Water: DEP Extends NPDES General Permit for Point Source Discharges to Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the Application of Pesticides
On August 27, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin that the department was “extending for 12 months, the availability of the current [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System—NPDES] General Permit for Point Source Discharges to Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the Application of Pesticides (PAG-15)” (46 Pa.B. 5640).  According to DEP,  “[t]he existing PAG-15 in effect at this time will expire on October 28, 2016…[and] [p]ersons that are operating under the PAG-15 General Permit may continue to operate until October 28, 2017, or the expiration date of coverage identified on the permit coverage approval page, whichever is later.

Inspection: FSIS Announces Request to Renew Voluntary Interstate Shipment of Meat and Poultry Products Program
On August 26, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) published notice in the Federal Register “announcing its intention to renew the approved information collection regarding the voluntary cooperative interstate shipment program” (81 FR 58903).  According to FSIS, the program in question is a voluntary cooperative inspection program, administered by FSIS, “under which State-inspected establishments with 25 or fewer employees are eligible to ship meat and poultry products in interstate commerce.” The comment period for the published notice ends October 25, 2016. 

Raw Milk: Utah Dept. of Health Links Salmonellosis Outbreak to Raw Milk
On August 30, 2016, the Utah Department of Health issued a news release announcing that State health officials were investigating nine illnesses associated with the consumption of raw milk purchased at Heber Valley Milk in Wasatch County, Utah.  According to the news release, on August 23, 2016, “a raw milk sample collected at the dairy by a Utah Department of Agriculture and Food inspector was positive for Salmonella Saintpaul.” The news release also stated that recent testing of raw milk samples collected from Heber Valley Milk  have not tested positive for salmonella, and as a result, the dairy has been allowed to resume sales.

Beef: AMS Proposes Amendment to the Beef Promotion and Research Rules and Regulations
On August 23, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published notice in the Federal Register of a “proposed rule [that] would amend the Beef Promotion and Research Order (Order) established under the Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985 (Act) to add six Harmonized Tariff System (HTS) codes for imported veal and veal products and update assessment levels for imported veal and veal products based on revised determinations of live animal equivalencies” (81 FR57495).  The comment period for the proposed rule closes October 24, 2016.

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 26, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Labeling: FDA Revises Nutritional Labels
On May 20, 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an unpublished notice in the Federal Register regarding revisions to the regulations governing nutritional and supplemental facts labels (2016-11867).  According to the pre-publication final rule, the amendment “updates the list of nutrients that are required or permitted to be declared; provides updated Daily Reference Values and Reference Daily Intake values that are based on current dietary recommendations from consensus reports; amends requirements for foods represented or purported to be specifically for children under the age of 4 years and pregnant and lactating women and establishes nutrient reference values specifically for these population subgroups; and revises the format and appearance of the Nutrition Facts label.” The final rule is scheduled for publication on May 27, 2016, and becomes effective on July 26, 2016.

Labor: DOL Finalizes “White Collar” Overtime Regulations
On May 23, 2016, the Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Division published notice in the Federal Register of a final rule revising “regulations under the FLSA [Federal Labor Standards Act] implementing the exemption from minimum wage and overtime pay for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employees” (81 FR 32391).  Commonly known as the “EAP” or “white collar” exemptions, DOL’s final rule increases the current annual salary threshold for the exemption from $23,660 ($455/week) to $47,476 ($913/week).  The new regulations become effective December 1, 2016.

GE Food: Canada Approves AquaAdvantage Salmon for Livestock Feed
On May 19, 2016, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) issued Decision Document DD2016-117 regarding the approval of the genetically engineered AquaAdvantage Salmon for use as livestock feed.  According to CIFA, the “feed ingredients derived from this animal with a novel trait does not present livestock feed safety or nutrition concerns when compared to feeds derived from salmon currently permitted to be used as livestock feed in Canada.” As a result, as of May 19, 20016, feed ingredients derived from AquaAdvantage Salmon are authorized for use in livestock feeds in Canada.

Transportation: Proposed PA Legislation Assigns Gross Weight for Milk Hauling
On May 23, 2016, Pennsylvania governor Tom Wolf was presented with legislation that would amend Title 75 (Vehicles) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (SB 1108).  Under the proposed legislation, vehicles “hauling milk to or from a manufacturer…may be permitted by the department and local authorities to move upon highways within their respective jurisdictions 24 hours a day, seven days a week, except during inclement weather as defined in department regulations, if the gross weight does not exceed 95,000 pounds and the weight of any nonsteering axle does not exceed 21,000 pounds.”

Equine: Clarifying Legislation Introduced for PA Breeding Fund
On May 23, 2016, Pennsylvania House Representative John A. Lawrence introduced House Bill 923 which is “legislation to clarify language in the recently passed Administrative Code regarding the eligibility of thoroughbreds receiving payments from the Pennsylvania Breeding Fund, a restricted account within the State Racing Fund that provides incentive awards for winning Pennsylvania born/bred thoroughbred race horses.” Accordingly, the proposed legislation was referred to the House Agricultural and Rural Affairs Committee.