Showing posts with label meat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meat. Show all posts

Friday, December 20, 2019

Agricultural Law Weekly Review —December 19, 2019

Written by:  
Brook Duer—Staff Attorney
Audry Thompson—Research Assistant

The Agricultural Law Weekly Review provides an update of recent agricultural law developments from the local, state, national, and international levels.  Subscribe to the ALWR at pennstateaglaw.com

International Trade:  United States and China Reach “Phase One” Trade Agreement
On December 13, 2019, the White House announced a “Phase One trade deal” with China that requires “changes to China’s economic and trade regime,” including  agricultural trade, and “a commitment by China to make substantial additional purchases of U.S. goods in the coming years.”  However, no specific details have yet been provided in writing by either the White House or the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).   The text of a Fact Sheet on the USTR website dated December 13, 2019, titled “Agreement Between the United States of America and The People’s Republic of China," remains the sole written documentation from the United States government’s Executive Branch outlining  the agreement terms.  Regarding agricultural trade, it states: “The Agriculture Chapter addresses structural barriers to trade and will support a dramatic expansion of U.S. food, agriculture and seafood product exports, increasing American farm and fishery income, generating more rural economic activity, and promoting job growth. A multitude of non-tariff barriers to U.S. agriculture and seafood products are addressed, including for meat, poultry, seafood, rice, dairy, infant formula, horticultural products, animal feed and feed additives, pet food, and products of agriculture biotechnology.”  The Fact Sheet goes on to state: “The Expanding Trade chapter includes commitments from China to import various U.S. goods and services over the next two years in a total amount that exceeds China’s annual level of imports for those goods and services in 2017 by no less than $200 billion. China’s commitments cover a variety of U.S. manufactured goods, food, agricultural and seafood products, energy products, and services. China’s increased imports of U.S. goods and services are expected to continue on this same trajectory for several years after 2021 and should contribute significantly to the rebalancing of the U.S.-China trade relationship.”

Pesticides: NY Governor Directs Ban on Chlorpyrifos by Agency Action  
On December 10, 2019, New York Governor Andew Cuomo vetoed New York State Senate Bill  Senate Bill 5343, a bill to phase out the use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos in the State of New York by December 1, 2021, and directed the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) in the veto memorandum to immediately prohibit chlorpyrifos use by aerial spraying.  Veto Memorandum #193 also adds language in which the Governor’s Office requires DEC to take further regulatory action to ban chlorpyrifos use for all purposes by December 2020, except apple tree trunk spraying, which will be banned by July 2021.  The end result is that the timetable for discontinuing chlorpyrifos use legally in New York is accelerated by at least one year for most uses and by six months for all uses.
Food Labeling: Arkansas Federal Court Blocks State’s Meat Labeling Law
On December 11, 2019, Judge Kristine G. Baker of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division, granted a preliminary injunction preventing the State of Arkansas from enforcing portions of a 2019 law titled Truth in Labeling of Agricultural Products that are Edible by Humans.” This legislation, also known as Act 501, declares it to be misbranding to label an agricultural product as “meat or a meat product when the agricultural product is not derived from harvested livestock, poultry or cervids.”  The injunction was entered in a lawsuit brought by Turtle Island Foods SPC d/b/a Tofurky Company challenging Arkansas’ law as a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment and Commerce Clause. Case No. 4:19-cv-00514-KGB.  The court agreed that an injunction was warranted while the litigation was pending and it remains in place until further court order.

Industrial Hemp: USDA Extends Comment Period on Hemp Production Rule 
On December 17, 2019, USDA announced that it extended the public comment period for its Interim Final Rule on Domestic Hemp Production an additional thirty (30) days from December 29, 2019 to January 29, 2020, to allow stakeholders additional time to provide feedback.  For more on the Interim Final Rule, see the Agricultural Law Weekly Review of October 31, 2019

Conservation Programs:  NRCS Solicits Public Comment on Interim Rule For EQIP
On December 17, 2019, USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) published  a new Interim Rule for the working lands Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) in order to conform the enabling regulations for the program to statutory amendments made in the 2018 Farm Bill.  The Interim Rule is effective immediately but a public comment period is open until February 17, 2020.


From National Ag Law Experts: 
Brigit Rollins, Water Wars Continued: Courts Dispute Role of Groundwater Under CWA (December 12, 2019).
Sharon Anglin Treat, Maine’s Plan to Address “Forever Chemicals” Polluting Farms, Water and Food (December 11, 2019).

Penn State Research:
Matt Carroll, Fiber-Optic Cables Capture Thunderquake Rumbles (December 11, 2019).
Gail McCormick, Agricultural Parasite Avoids Evolutionary Arms Race, Shuts Down Genes of Host (December 17, 2019).

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:
Pennsylvania Adds 29 Farms, 2,450 Acres to Nation-Leading Farmland Preservation Program (December 12, 2019).
Ag Department Calls for Grant Proposals to Strengthen Market for PA Vegetable, Fruit, Nut, Nursery Specialty Crops (December 16, 2019).

Pennsylvania Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
Department of Environmental Protection 
49 Pa.B. 7363 “Agricultural Advisory Board Meeting Rescheduled [Monday, January 27, 2020]” Notice (December 14, 2019).
49 Pa.B. 7364 “Opening of New Grant Round for Recycling Program Development and Implementation Grants under Section 902 of Act 101, Municipal Waste Planning, Recycling and Waste Reduction Act of 1988” Notice (December 14, 2019).
49 Pa.B. 7368 “Recycling Grant Awards under the Municipal Waste Planning, Recycling and Waste Reduction Act of 1988, Act 101” Notice (December 14, 2019).

Department of Labor and Industry
49 Pa.B. 7374 “Maximum Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Payable” Notice (December 14, 2019).

Fish and Boat Commission
49 Pa.B. 7298 “Fishing in Lake Erie and Boundary Lakes” Proposed Rule (December 14, 2019).
49 Pa.B. 7296 “Fishing; Special Fishing Regulations” Rules and Regulations (December 14, 2019).
49 Pa.B. 7297 “Fishing; Special Fishing Regulations” Rules and Regulations (December 14, 2019).

Pennsylvania Legislature
H.B. 1223 “An Act providing for the creation of keystone opportunity dairy zones to facilitate the economic development of Pennsylvania's dairy industry . . . .” Re-committed to Appropriations (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 1224 “An Act amending the act of April 28, 1937 (P.L.417, No.105), known as the Milk Marketing Law, in purpose, short title and definitions, further providing for definitions and construction; in general powers of the board, providing for coordination with Department of Revenue; and, in prices of milk, further providing for cooperatives.” Re-committed to Appropriations (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 2131 “An Act amending the act of June 30, 1981 (P.L.128, No.43), known as the Agricultural Area Security Law, further providing for purchase of agricultural conservation easements.” Referred to Agriculture and Rural Affairs [House] (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 1348 “An Act providing for limited civil liability for agritourism activity providers, for notice of limited civil liability and for acknowledgment of limited civil liability.” Removed from table [House] (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 2040 “An Act providing for the PA Second Chance Jobs website and for powers and duties of the Department of Labor and Industry.” Removed from table [House] (December 16, 2019).
S.B. 166 “An Act providing for the capital budget for the fiscal year 2019-2020 and for limitation on redevelopment assistance capital projects; and making a related repeal.” Re-committed to Appropriations (December 16, 2019).
S.B. 742 “An Act providing for vehicle emissions modeling by Department of Transportation and for report to General Assembly.” Laid on table [House] (December 16, 2019).
S.B. 905 “An Act providing for the capital budget for fiscal year 2019-2020; itemizing public improvement projects, furniture and equipment projects, transportation assistance, redevelopment assistance projects, flood control projects, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission projects and Manufacturing Fund projects . . . .” Re-reported as amended (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 2124 “An Act providing for foreclosed property maintenance; and imposing penalties.” Referred to Urban Affairs (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 2128 “An Act amending the act of May 1, 1984 (P.L.206, No.43), known as the Pennsylvania Safe Drinking Water Act, further providing for powers and duties of Environmental Quality Board.” Referred to Environmental Resources and Energy [House]  (December 16, 2019).
H.B. 1106 “An Act amending the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.177, No.175), known as The Administrative Code of 1929, providing for environmental permits and plan approvals; making related repeals; and abrogating regulations.” Removed from table (December 16, 2019).

Federal Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
Agriculture Department 
84 FR 68875 “Meeting Notice of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, Education, and Economics Advisory Board” Notice (December 17, 2019).

Agricultural Marketing Service 
84 FR 68816 “National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Validation of Refining Processes” Proposed Rule—Comment Period (December 17, 2019).

Commodity Credit Corporation
84 FR 69272 “Environmental Quality Incentives Program” Rule (December 17, 2019).

Employment and Training Administration
84 FR 67681 “Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers” Proposed Rule (December 11, 2019).

Environmental Protection Agency
84 FR 67740 “Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New Uses” Notice—Comment Period (December 11, 2019).
84 FR 68444 “Clean Water Act: Maryland-Chester River Vessel Sewage No-Discharge Zone-Final Affirmative Determination” Notice—Comment Period (December 16, 2019).

Federal Emergency Management Agency
84 FR 68182 “Final Flood Hazard Determinations” Notice (December 13, 2019).
84 FR 68184 “Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations” Notice (December 13, 2019).
84 FR 68186 “Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Winneshiek County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas” Notice (December 13, 2019).

Food and Safety and Inspection Service 
84 FR 68101 “Notice of Request for a New Information Collection: Small Meat Processor Study” Notice—Comment Period (December 13, 2019).
84 FR 67911 “Notice of Request for a New Information Collection: Focus Group Research to Inform Consumer Food Safety Education and Outreach” Notice—Comment Period (December 12, 2019).

Occupational Safety and Health Administration
84 FR 68794 “Walking-Working Surfaces, Personal Protective Equipment (Fall Protection Systems), and Special Industries (Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution); Corrections” Rule (December 17, 2019).

Reclamation Bureau
84 FR 68943 “Change in Discount Rate for Water Resources Planning” Notice (December 17, 2019).
84 FR 68941 “Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other Water-Related Contract Actions” Notice (December 17, 2019).

Rural Business-Cooperative Service
84 FR 67703 “Inviting Applications for Value-Added Producer Grants and Solicitation of Grant Reviewers” Notice (December 11, 2019).

Rural Utilities Services
84 FR 67913 “ReConnect Pilot Program” Notice—Comment Period (December 12, 2019).

Surface Transportation Board
84 FR 67991 “60-Day Notice of Intent To Seek Extension of Approval: Information Collection Activities-Recordations (Rail and Water Carrier Liens), Water Carrier Tariffs, and Agricultural Contract Summaries” Notice—Comment Period (December 12, 2019).

Susquehanna River Basin Commission
84 FR 68285 “Grandfathering (GF) Registration Notice” Notice (December 13, 2019).
84 FR 68284 “Actions Taken at December 5, 2019, Meeting” Notice (December 13, 2019).
84 FR 68283 “Projects Approved for Consumptive Uses of Water” Notice (December 13, 2019).
84 FR 68286 “Projects Approved for Consumptive Uses of Water” Notice (December 13, 2019).

Trade Representative, Office of the United States
84 FR 68286 “Determination Not To Reinstate Action in Connection With the European Union's Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products” Notice (December 13, 2019).

Wage and Hour Division
84 FR 68736 “Regular Rate Under the Fair Labor Standards Act” Rule (December 16, 2019)

U.S. House Agriculture Committee Actions: 
H.R.5436 “To amend the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, with respect to enforcement of animal fighting ventures prohibition in the territories, and for other purposes.” Referred to House Committee on Agriculture (December 16, 2019).
H.R.5435 “To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Chief of the United States Forest Service to meet certain targets for the reduction of the emission of greenhouse gases, and for other purposes.” Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Education and Labor (December 16, 2019).
H.R.5430 “United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act.” Ms. McCollum asked unanimous consent that it be in order at any time without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House, the bill, H.R. 5430, that the bill be considered as read, that the bill be debatable for two hours equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader or their respective designees, and that, pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion. Agreed to without objection. (December 17, 2019).
H.R.5416 “To establish a National Climate Bank.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials (December 13, 2019).
H.R.5235 “To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require States to include a photograph on electronic benefit cards issued to provide supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations (December 13, 2019).
H.R.5218 “Proven Forest Management Act of 2019.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry (December 13, 2019).
H.R.5217 “WOW Act.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry (December 11, 2019).
H.R.5179 “Tribal Wildlife Corridors Act of 2019.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry (December 11, 2019).
H.R.5174 “State Sponsored Visa Pilot Program Act of 2019.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition, Oversight, and Department Operations (December 11, 2019).
H.Res.742 “Recognizing the continued success of the Food for Peace Act.” Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock and Foreign Agriculture (December 11, 2019).

U.S. Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry Committee Actions: 
S.3053 “A bill to provide for the regulation, inspection, and labeling of food produced using animal cell culture technology, and for other purposes.” Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry (December 16, 2019).

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

December 11-17, 2019 Top Tweets:
“Corn growers hope for swift passage of USMCA” (December 11, 2019)

Connect with us on FacebookEvery week we post the CASL Ledger detailing all of our publications and activities from the week. 

Want to get updates, but prefer to listen?  Check out the Agricultural Law PodcastSubscribe at our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.

Review last month’s biggest legal developments in agriculture in the November 2019 Agricultural Law BriefIf you’d like to receive this monthly update via email, check out our website and subscribe.

Monday, October 19, 2015

Kraft Ordered to Fulfill Turkey Meat Contract

Written by Katharine Richter

On September 29, 2015, Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge, Patricia A. McInerney granted the plaintiffs, Mrs. Ressler’s Food Products Co., a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Kraft Heinz Foods Company.

The lawsuit arose when Kraft reduced its sale of turkey breast to Mrs. Ressler’s Food Products Co., a family-owner meat processor, by 10% and then ultimately suspended shipment.  In September, Kraft informed Mrs. Ressler’s they were suspending all turkey sales indefinitely.  According to the complaint filed by the plaintiffs, the reduction in turkey sales was an attempt to force Mrs. Ressler out of business.  The contract formed in late 2014 had Kraft agreeing to provide Mrs. Ressler’s with 4 million pounds of turkey breast through 2015.  This would amount to 40% of Mrs. Ressler’s turkey supply.  The contract would cost Mrs. Ressler no more than $2.70 per pound for turkey breast, but instead of supplying the company, the complaint stated, Kraft was using the turkey meat for its own products as well as selling it in the open market for a price of $5.70 per pound.

Kraft argued that that due to the avian outbreak, it had to reduce turkey breast sales and further, that the cut posed no threat to Mrs. Ressler’s.  Mrs. Ressler argued they were both economically harmed by relying on the contract as well as loss of reputation by not being able to satisfy customer orders. 


Additional documents relating to this case can be found here, by searching under the court records tab, civil dockets and searching plaintiff's name, "Mrs. Ressler’s Food Products Co."

Friday, June 12, 2015

House Passes Bill Repealing Beef, Chicken, and Pork from COOL

  On June 10, 2015, the United States House of Representatives passed proposed House Bill 2393, which repeals Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) requirements as applied to muscle cut meat commodities: beef, pork, and chicken.  The amendment to COOL passed through a yea/nay vote of 300-131.  The Bill still needs to be presented and voted on in the Senate.     
  
  According to the House Committee on Agriculture website, supporters of the repeal believe it’s a necessary step in order to bring the United States into compliance with the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling.  The Bill also ensures avoidance of retaliatory sanctions, such as tariffs, from two of the U.S.’s top trading partners, Canada and Mexico. 


  Although chicken was not included in the WTO ruling, which was aimed at beef and pork labeling, Chairman Michael Conaway (R-TX) stated, “We also eliminate the requirement for chicken, which faced high costs and little if any quantifiable benefits ... [n]o other products are affected.”  All other products, such as fruits, vegetables, and peanuts, would continue to adhere to COOL requirements.

Written by Katharine Richter- Research Assistant

June 12, 2015

Monday, June 8, 2015

Canada and Mexico Seek Sanctions against United States over COOL

  On June 5, 2015, Canada and Mexico requested the right to impose sanctions worth $3 billion on the United States through the World Trade Organization (WTO).  The request comes after U.S. failure to meet WTO recommendations on the Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) ruling.  WTO’s meeting to decide on whether to implement sanctions is scheduled for June 17, 2015.

    The dispute over COOL originated December 1, 2008 when Canada claimed COOL violated both WTO’s Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) agreement and General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).  The dispute specifically focused on imported muscle cut meat commodities: beef and pork.  Mexico requested to join Canada in the proceedings December 12, 2008. On November 18, 2011, WTO ruled that the U.S. had violated both TBT and GATT.  WTO found COOL created a detrimental effect on competitive opportunities for imported livestock by unfairly making domestic products more favorable. 

  Though the U.S. appealed the decision on March 23, 2012, the decision was reaffirmed by the WTO Appellate Body on June 29, 2012.  On May 24, 2013, the U.S. issued an amended final rule 78 Fed. Reg. 31367 to meet WTO recommendations.  Canada and Mexico stated the rule was protectionist and requested compliance proceedings.  On October 20, 2014, WTO found that the U.S. amended COOL measures contained the same violations as the prior regulation.

  Congress has not reached a unanimous decision on how to handle the recent challenges to COOL.  While advocates believe COOL provides a legitimate objective by providing country of origin information to beef and pork consumers, opponents cite a USDA economic study that found that unless there is an increased demand for beef and pork by consumers based on COOL information, implementing COOL results in losses along supply chains. 


  On May 18, 2015, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Michael Conaway (R-TX) introduced H.R. 2398, which would repeal beef, pork, and chicken from COOL.  On May 20, 2015, the House Agriculture Committee favorably reported H.R. 2393 to the House where it is expected to go to the House floor in early June.  

Written by Katharine Richter- Research Assistant

June 8, 2015

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Labeling of Mechanically Tenderized Beef


On May 13, 2015, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced a new labeling requirement for beef products that have been mechanically tenderized. 

Often called “blading” or “needling,” the practice of mechanical tenderization involves the insertion of a series of razor sharp knives or needles into a piece of beef in an effort to cut through tough connective tissue.   While this process creates a tender piece of meat, it also increases the possibility that food-borne pathogens like E. coli could be pressed deep into the center of the meat.   
Fortunately, food-borne pathogens such as E. coli can be killed through cooking beef above certain temperaturesUnfortunately, because the process of mechanical tenderization could push these pathogens into the center of a piece of meat, for safe consumption, it may be necessary to employ different cooking methods.  As a result, effective May 2016, USDA will require that all mechanically tenderized beef products carry labels that 1) state that the product is mechanically tenderized and 2) provide the proper instructions on how to safely  cook the product.
Written by M. Sean High - Staff Attorney
May 19, 2015

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

American Meat Institute Files Suit Against USDA Over Country of Origin Labeling Rule


On July 8, 2013 the American Meat Institute (AMI), together with several American and Canadian cattle and meat associations, filed a complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture alleging that the final mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) rule violates the First Amendment, the Agricultural Marketing Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

The revised COOL rule, designed to inform consumers of the country of origin of certain covered commodities, was challenged by Canada and Mexico before the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2012 under the Technical Barriers to Trade agreement (TBT). According to Canada and Mexico, COOL requirements imposed burdens on the meat products supply chain that discriminated against their livestock exports. The WTO Appellate Body agreed, noting that there was no health and safety basis for COOL, and mandated that the United States bring COOL into compliance with the TBT agreement or potentially face retaliatory measures from affected foreign countries. The Agricultural Marketing Service of the USDA released the amended COOL rule on May 23, 2013 in an effort to bring COOL in compliance with the TBT. (For more information on COOL, please see our Current Issues Page on the Agricultural Law Center’s website.)

As discussed in our previous COOL blog post, Canada and Mexico as well as many domestic organizations such as AMI were still unsatisfied with COOL. AMI alleges in its complaint that COOL violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution because COOL compels speech that serves no substantial government interest since there is no health and safety basis for COOL. AMI also claims that COOL exceeds the authority granted by the Agricultural Marketing Act because COOL was not intended to implement point-of-processing labels as defined in the 2008 Farm Bill. Finally, AMI alleges that COOL violates the Administrative Procedures Act because it is arbitrary and capricious; COOL misleads consumers about the true origin of meat products and exacerbates the WTO violations.

The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and is docketed at 1:13-cv-01033. More information on COOL and the case can be found on AMI’s website.
Written by Sarah Doyle - Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
July 9, 2013