Showing posts with label US Supreme Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Supreme Court. Show all posts

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—March 24, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Labor: SCOTUS Upholds Donning and Doffing Class Action against Tyson
On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled against Tyson Foods’ (Tyson) objection to the certification of a class action involving overtime pay and employee time spent donning and doffing protective gear worn at a pork processing plant in Iowa (Tyson Foods,Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, 2016 WL 1092414).  According to the Court opinion, Tyson claimed that because the type of protective gear worn varied among the employees at the plant, “the employees’ claims were not sufficiently similar to be resolved on a classwide basis.” The Court held that sample evidence produced by an expert witness, who observed videotape of the employees donning and doffing activities and compiled a study that provided an average of these times, satisfied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 class action requirement for a “question of law or fact common to class members.”

GMO Labeling: Kellogg, General Mills, and Mars Announce Nationwide Labeling Plans
On March 23, 2016, Kellogg issued a press release stating that in order to comply with the state of Vermont’s GMO labeling law, scheduled to go into effect on July 1, 2016, the company “will start labeling some of [its] products nationwide for the presence of GMOs beginning in mid-to-late April.” The decision by Kellogg echoes similar statements issued by General Mills and Mars on March 18, 2016.  According to General Mills, because the company cannot label “products for only one state without significantly driving up costs…consumers all over the U.S. will soon begin seeing words legislated by the state of Vermont on the labels of many of their favorite General Mills products.” According to Mars, although the company “firmly believe[s] GM ingredients are safe…in order [t]o comply with [the Vermont labeling law], Mars is introducing clear, on-pack labeling on our products that contain GM ingredients nationwide.”

BSE: FDA Issues Final Rule on “Mad Cow Disease” in Human Food
On March 17, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a press release announcing a final rule “designed to further reduce the potential risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), sometimes referred to as ‘mad cow disease,’ in human food.” According to the final rule, published in in the Federal register March 18, 2016, FDA has “designated the following items as prohibited cattle materials: Specified risk materials (SRMs), the small intestine from all cattle (unless the distal ileum has been removed), material from nonambulatory disabled cattle, material from cattle not inspected and passed, or mechanically separated (MS) (Beef).” Intended “to minimize human exposure to certain cattle material that could potentially contain the BSE agent,” the finalized rule becomes effective April 18, 2016.

Food Safety:  Canada Approves Genetically Engineered Potato
On March 22, 2016, J.R. Simplot issued a press release stating that Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency have approved for sale in Canada J.R. Simplot’s Innnate® Gen. 1 potato, a product genetically engineered to reduce browning or bruising when cut.  According to the Canadian Press, “the potatoes will not have a label indicating they are genetically engineered, as that's not a Health Canada requirement provided they've been deemed safe for consumption.” Relatedly, on March 20, 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration concluded that J.R. Simplot’s Innate potatoes were “as safe and nutritious as their conventional counterparts,” and as a result, safe for human consumption.  According to J.R. Simplot, Innate® Gen. 1 potatoes are currently being “grown and sold in the U.S. fresh market under the White Russet™ brand.”

International Relations: USDA Announces Agricultural Measures with Cuba
On March 21, 2016, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a press release announcing “several measures that will foster further collaboration between the U.S. and Cuban agricultural sectors.” According to Agricultural Secretary Tom Vilsack, USDA will now permit “the 22 industry-funded Research and Promotion Programs and 18 Market Order organizations to conduct authorized research and information exchange activities with Cuba.” Secretary Vilsack expressed a belief that the measures will assist in expanding trade between the two nations.  The press release stated, however, that while “the Trade Sanctions Reform Act (TSRA) of 2000 permits the export of U.S. agricultural commodities…U.S. agricultural exports to Cuba are limited by U.S. restrictions on government export assistance, cash payments, and extending credit.”

Legislation: Pennsylvania Senate Votes Unanimously for Industrial Hemp
On March 16, 2016, the Pennsylvania Senate voted 49-0 to pass Senate Bill 50 (SB50).  According to the proposed legislation’s Senate Co-Sponsorship Memoranda, SB50 “will provide for an industrial hemp industry in the Commonwealth through the establishment of an Industrial Hemp Licensing Board within the Department of Agriculture to license and regulate the cultivation, growth and sale of industrial hemp.”  Following the Senate vote, on March 17, 2016, SB50 was referred to the House Agriculture and Rural Affairs committee.

Friday, January 22, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review: January 22, 2016

Written by M. Sean High - Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Oil and Gas: Court Rules Compressor Station May be built Next to Farm
On January 7, 2016, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania determined that the New Sewickley Township Board of Supervisors (Beaver County, PA) acted properly when the Township agreed to permit the construction of a gas compressor station on land adjacent to an organic farm (Kretschmann Farm, LLC v. Twp. Of New Sewickley, No. 360 C.D. 2015). According to the Court, the organic farmers' failed to present evidence that: 1) the proposed gas compressor station would cause harm to the “health, safety, and well-being of the Township’s residents;” or 2) the Township’s action was a violation of United States and Pennsylvania constitutional rights.  

HPAI: Government Confirms HPAI in Indiana Commercial Turkey Flock
On January 15, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) issued a press release confirming the detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in an Indiana commercial turkey flock.  According to USDA APHIS, the strain of HPAI detected in the flock is H7N8, “a different strain of HPAI than the strains that caused the 2015 outbreak.” As of January 22, 2016, the Indiana State Board of Animal Health reported the depopulation of 414,503 turkeys suspected of being infected with H7N8.   

WOTUS: President Vetoes Measure to Overturn WOTUS; Senate Blocks Veto Override
On January 20, 2016, President Obama vetoed a joint resolution of Congress (S.J.RES.22) that would have overturned “the rule submitted by the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the definition of ‘waters of the United States’ under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.” On January 21, 2016, the U.S. Senate voted 52-40 to override the President’s veto.  The Senate’s action, however, fell eight votes short of the majority number required to override a presidential veto.

Immigration: Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to President’s Actions on Immigration
On January 19, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear a case brought by 26 states challenging President Obama’s executive action authority regarding the federal immigration programs Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., CaseNo. 15-674).   

Raw Milk: Illinois Legalizes Raw Milk Sales
On January 13, 2016, the Illinois Joint Commission on Administrative Rules approved regulations that now allow the on-farm sale of raw milk by producers that acquire a permit issued by the Illinois Department of Health.  The new regulations are scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2016.

Legislation: Agreement Reached on School Nutrition Standards
On January 15, 2016, the School Nutrition Association (SNA) issued a press release announcing that the organization had “worked collaboratively with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), the White House and the Senate Agriculture Committee to reach an agreement to improve nutrition standards for school meals.” According to the press release, the agreement is scheduled for inclusion in the Senate Agriculture Committee’s Child Nutrition Reauthorization bill. 

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Supreme Court Sides with Raisin Growers


On May 22, 2015, the United States Supreme Court struck down that the federal raisin marketing order's reserve requirement clause as an unconstitutional taking of property. 

Prior to the Court’s ruling, in order to be permitted to sell raisin, all raisin growers were required to participate in the federal raisin marketing order program.  Importantly, as part of the federal raisin marketing order program, all raisin growers were required to surrender (or “reserve”) a portion of their crop to the federal government without any compensation.   

In an eight to one ruling, the Court determined that the federal raisin marketing order’s reserve requirement violated the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment forbidding the government from taking property without just compensation.  According to the Court, raisins are property and the federal government does not have the right to force a business owner to surrender a portion of that property simply for the privilege of participating in commerce. 
 
To read the full Court opinion, please click here.
 
Written by M. Sean High - Staff Attorney
June 24, 2015