Showing posts with label Swine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Swine. Show all posts

Friday, October 11, 2019

Agricultural Law Weekly Review - September 19, 2019

Written by: 
Jackie Schweichler—Staff Attorney
Audry Thompson—Research Assistant
           
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

WOTUS: EPA Repeals 2015 Rule Defining “Waters of the United States” 
On September 12, 2019, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced the repeal of the 2015 Clean Water Act rule defining “waters of the United States” (WOTUS).  According to EPA, the repeal of the 2015 rule is the first step in its two-step approach to redefine WOTUS and clearly distinguish between federally regulated and state-controlled waters.  For the second step, EPA proposed a new WOTUS definition in December 2018 (84 FR 4154).  The final rule will become active after 60 days once published in the Federal Register.  For further explanation of “waters of the United States,” see the March 7, 2017 and January 2, 2019 Agricultural Law in the Spotlight articles, Executive Order on the “Waters of the United States” Rule and U.S. EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Issue Proposed Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States.”

Food Safety: USDA Announces Swine Slaughter Inspection Final Rule
On September 17, 2019, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the final rule, Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection The purpose of the final rule is to “improve the effectiveness of market hog slaughter inspections” and to reduce pathogens in pork food products.  The final rule allows market hog slaughter facilities to choose whether to operate under the New Swine Slaughter Inspection System (NSIS) or continue to use the existing system.  Facilities choosing to operate under NSIS must create and maintain new procedures in their Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems. According to the announcement, all swine slaughterhouses will have new microbial testing requirements.  The final rule also revises sampling requirements for small establishments.

Water Quality: Iowa Court Allows Stormwater Pollution Case to Move Forward 
On September 10, 2019, the Iowa District Court for Polk County denied a motion to dismiss in a lawsuit involving pollution in the Raccoon River (Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, et al., v. State of Iowa, et al., Case No. EQCE084330).  The plaintiffs, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement and Food & Water Watch, filed this suit alleging that Iowa has failed to protect the state’s waterways from pollution. They argue that the nitrate pollution from fertilizer pollutes the Raccoon River, affecting drinking water and recreation activities.  The plaintiffs are asking the state to issue a remedial plan with pollution controls. The plaintiffs also would like the court to prohibit the construction of new animal feeding operations.  The state argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing and that the claims constitute a political question. The court agreed with the plaintiffs and denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

Food Labeling: Government Accountability Office Releases Report on Food Label Dates
On September 9, 2019, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on food label dates, Date Labels on Packaged Foods, USDA and FDA Could Take Additional Steps to Reduce Consumer Confusion.  The purpose of the report was to examine how USDA and FDA address consumer confusion over date labeling on food packages. According to GAO, 133 billion pounds of food is lost or wasted each year, and consumer confusion may be responsible for part of this waste.  GAO recommends that USDA and FDA should collaborate with nonfederal stakeholders, such as state, local, and tribal governments. GAO suggests that this additional coordination will help ensure that methods to reduce consumer confusion will be more effective. 

National Agricultural Policy: White House Declares National Farm Safety and Health Week
On September 13, 2019, the White House issued the Presidential Proclamation on National Farm Safety and Health Week, 2019.  The proclamation declared the National Farm Safety and Health Week (Farm Safety Week) for September 15 through September 21, 2019.  According to the proclamation, there were 581 work-related deaths for agricultural workers in 2017.  The purpose of Farm Safety Week will be to raise awareness of the dangers of agricultural work in order to improve safety practices. The proclamation was published in the Federal Register on September 17, 2019. 

From National Ag Law Experts:
Juliette Majot, Climate change and a new agricultural system (August 8, 2019)
Karen Hansen-Kuhn, Mexico’s move toward food self-sufficiency confronts GMOs (September 2, 2019) 

Federal Actions and Notices:
Agricultural Marketing Service

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service


Executive Office of the President

Farm Credit Administration

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Food and Drug Administration
Susquehanna River Basin Commission

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Environmental Protection

Milk Marketing Board:

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:

Penn State Research:

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks:
Hemp Farmers Face $7.5b in Losses (Sept. 13, 2019)
Report: US Organic Acres Set Record” (Sept. 12, 2019)

Connect with us on FacebookEvery week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Want to get updates, but prefer to listen? Check out the Agricultural Law PodcastWe can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.

Review last month’s biggest legal developments in agriculture in the August 2019 Agricultural Law BriefIf you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe!

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Court Rules on Preliminary Objections in Luzerne County CAFO Case

Written by M. Sean High

On October 29, 2015, in the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County Pennsylvania, a ruling was rendered regarding Country View Family Farms, LLC’s preliminary objections in a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) case involving a Salem Township pig farm.

The legal action in question originated from an April 27, 2015 complaint filed by multiple Salem Township residents seeking relief from the operation of a neighboring CAFO.  In their complaint, 90 individual plaintiffs collectively stated that “foul-smelling odors particulate matter, harmful chemical compounds, pathogens, other hazardous substances, and in some cases flies, generated at Defendants’ CAFO and the spreading of swine manure and urine, have intermittently and frequently escaped and continue to escape form Defendants’ CAFO  and the spreading fields and invade Plaintiffs’ properties, and thus have and continue to substantially impaired Plaintiffs’ use and quiet enjoyment of their properties, and caused substantial annoyance, inconvenience and discomfort and property devaluation.”

Defendant Country View Family Farms, LLC countered Plaintiffs’ allegations by filing seven preliminary objections to the complaint.  According to Defendant’s brief in support of the preliminary objections: 1) Plaintiffs’ nuisance claim (both public and private) was legally and factually insufficient; 2) allegations concerning harm to nearby schools, a hospital, a retirement village and Thompson’s Run Creek should be stricken; 3) allegations concerning potential violation of a Salem Township zoning ordinance should be stricken; 4) Plaintiffs’ trespass claim was legally and factually insufficient; 5) Plaintiffs’ potential claim for negligence was improperly pleaded and legally insufficient; 6) demand for punitive damages should be stricken; and 7) the demand for diminution in value damages should be stricken.

With only one partial exception, the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County agreed with Country View Family Farms, LLC and ruled in favor of all seven of Defendant’s preliminary objections.  The lone exception concerned Country View Family Farms, LLC’s preliminary objection to Plaintiffs’ nuisance claim. Specifically, though the Court agreed with Country View Family Farms, LLC that Plaintiffs “public nuisance” claim should be stricken, the Court also ruled that Plaintiffs’ claim of “private nuisance” could proceed with the added requirement that within 45 days of the Order, Plaintiffs must submit an amended complaint “delineat[ing] with the requisite specificity the alleged injury” suffered by each one of the 90 individual plaintiffs. 

Friday, September 20, 2013

New GIPSA Rule on “Weighing; Feed and Swine Contractors” Takes Effect Today

The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) has amended the regulations  issued under the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921.  The final rule, which was released in the August 21, 2013, Federal Register will go into effect today, September 20, 2013.

The changes amend regulations regarding scale tickets to reduce redundant wording and clarify weighing procedures, add swine contractors to the list of firms that must comply with reweighing, and add feed to the list of items that may need reweighing.  Additional changes include amendments to regulations about weighing livestock and poultry to include the weighing process for feed, add a specific timeline for weighing poultry, and add swine contractors to the list of firms that must comply with care and promptness requirements.  The purpose of these amendments is “to ensure that payments by live poultry dealers and swine contractors to poultry and swine production contract growers are based on accurate weighing of both inputs and outputs.”

GIPSA is an agency of USDA which was established through a joining of the Federal Grain Inspection Service and the Packers and Stockyards Administration in 1994.  GIPSA is part of USDA’s Marketing and Regulatory Programs working to ensure a competitive and productive global marketplace for U.S. agricultural products.  GIPSA’s mission is “[t]o facilitate the marketing of livestock, poultry, meat, ceareals, oilseeds, and related products, and promote fair and competitive trading practices for the overall benefit of consumers and American Agriculture.”


For more information on GIPSA, please visit their website.  The final rule can be found in the August 21, 2013 Federal Register.

Written by Alyssa Looney – Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
@PSUAgLawCenter
September 20, 2013

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Government Accountability Office Releases Report on USDA Poultry Inspection Modernization

In August, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its report on food safety and the impact of new slaughter inspection procedures for poultry and hog inspections introduced in USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) pilot projects. The GAO had three objectives: (1) to determine the extent to which USDA has evaluated their pilot projects, (2) to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the pilot projects based on reviews by stakeholders, and (3) to determine the extent to which USDA disclosed any limitations in sources it relied upon to develop its proposed rule for the modernization of poultry slaughter inspections.

The USDA pilot projects were designed to take a new approach to slaughter inspections by initiating a risk-based, preventative, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) approach. The new procedures would eliminate FSIS inspectors from slaughter lines in order to free the inspectors to perform additional food safety and quality checks in high risk areas of the plant and place responsibility on industry to perform HACCP analysis.  The pilot projects, which were negotiated and started at twenty young chicken plants, five young turkey plants, and five young hog plants in 1998, are known as the HACCP-based Inspection Modules Projects (HIMP).

The USDA proposed rule for optional new poultry inspections is based on the pilot projects with some modifications. The GAO concludes that the proposed rule needs changes before finalization because USDA/FSIS has not thoroughly evaluated the three pilot projects. It states that the FSIS data analysis has limitations because the data was not designed to be comparable due to the age of the data and because the data was not compared uniformly among different plants, and data from the hog plants has not been evaluated, among other named concerns. The GAO recommends that the USDA clearly disclose to the public limitations in the information the agency relied on for rulemaking and to collect and analyze the information collected for young hogs to determine whether the pilot project is meeting its purpose. The USDA concurred with the GAO recommendations.

Please visit the GAO webpage for the full report.

Written by Sarah L. Doyle - Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
@PSUAgLawCenter
September 5, 2013

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Governor Signs Bill to Regulate Captive Swine for Hunting

On June 24, 2013, Governor Tom Corbett signed SB 644 into law as Act No. 25. This Act amends the definition of “wild animal” in Title 34 of the PA Consolidated Statutes to exclude any “species or variation of swine, pig or boar” that is kept in captivity. Act 25 also adds a subchapter, entitled Swine Hunting Preserves, to Title 3 of the PA Consolidated Statutes. The subchapter requires all male swine kept for hunting be neutered. In addition, the subchapter gives the authority to regulate captive swine kept for hunting, previously belonging to the Game Commission, to the Department of Agriculture.

For more information on Act 25, please see Pennsylvania’s General Assembly’s website.
Written By Clara E. Conklin – Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
June 25, 2013

Friday, October 28, 2011

New Insurance Opportunity for Pennsylvania Swine Producers

Between today and tomorrow, Oct. 28-29, Pennsylvania swine producers will have their first-ever opportunity to enroll in Livestock Gross Margin (LGM) insurance. The LGM insurance will protect swine producers against unexpected declines in the gross margin, or market value in both commercial and private sales-for-slaughter, minus feed costs. This type of risk management has never before been available to Pennsylvania's swine producers, and the aim is to assist producers in remaining viable through difficult economic times.

Under LGM insurance, producers will receive loss payments when actual margins fall below expected margins. The market and actual values of swine (minus feed costs), using the Chicago Mercantile Exchange futures and actual prices, will determine the expected and actual margin values.

Read the PA Dept. of Agriculture Press Release here.

Access a list of crop insurance agents licensed for this program here.

Written/Posted by Tanya J. Cramoy, Research Assistant