Showing posts with label Salmonella. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Salmonella. Show all posts

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 15, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

GIPSA: USDA Announces Updated Farmer Fair Practices Rules
On December 14, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) announced updated changes to the Farmer Fair Practices Rules.  According to USDA, the new regulations—contained in an interim final rule and two proposed rules—are intended to “level the playing field for farmers by proposing protections against the most egregious retaliatory practices harming chicken growers.” Relatedly, House Committee on Agricultural Chairman K. Michael Conaway (R-TX) issued a statement the he “will make it a priority to roll back these, and other midnight regulations from the Obama Administration, as soon as Congress returns in January.”  

FSMA: FDA Publishes Guidance for Voluntary Third-Party Certification
On December 6, 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register “announcing the availability of a guidance for industry and FDA staff entitled ‘Third-Party Certification Body Accreditation for Food Safety Audits: Model Accreditation Standards’” (81 FR 88099).  The guidance contains non-binding “FDA recommendations on third-party certification body qualifications for accreditation to conduct food safety audits and to issue food and/or facility certifications under an FDA program required by the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).”

Litigation: Court Rules FDA did not Negligently Issue Salmonella Warning
On December 2, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld a district court ruling that the United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) did not negligently issue a 2008 warning that certain types of raw red tomatoes were likely contamination with Salmonella Saintpaul (Seaside Farm, Inc., v. United States of America, 2016 WL 7030629).  According to the court, shortly after the warning was issued, it was determined that the outbreak did not result from tomatoes, but from jalapeƱo and serrano peppers imported from Mexico.  The plaintiff, Seaside Farms, alleged that FDA’s warning was negligent and devalued its tomato crop by $15,036,293.95.  The court determined that the warning properly fell within the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act and that the district court “ruling was essential to protect FDA’s vital role in safeguarding the public food supply.”

SNAP: USDA Announces Final Rule for Retail Establishments
On December 8, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) issued a news release announcing a final rule entitled Enhancing Retailer Standards in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).  According to FNS, the final rule amends the SNAP retailer eligibility criteria to require that authorized SNAP retail food establishments must “offer a larger inventory and variety of healthy food options.” Additionally, FNS stated that the final rule provides changes to the definition of the term “accessory food” so as to “ensure that stores are not able to participate in SNAP by selling primarily snack foods.”

Class Action: Post Holdings Announces Settlement of Egg Price-Fixing Claims
On December 8, 2016, Post Holdings announced that the company has agreed to pay $75 million to settle claims, asserted by direct purchasers of shell eggs against Michael Foods, Inc., for allegedly conspiring to inflate egg prices (In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, Case Number  2:08-md-02002).  Filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in 2008, the litigation predates Post Holdings acquisition of Michael Foods in 2014.  According to Post Holdings, “the terms of the settlement must be formally documented and are subject to approval by the court following notice to all class members.”

Industrial Hemp: 2017 Pilot Program Parameters Announced
On December 10, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin announcing the Industrial Hemp Research Pilot Program parameters for 2017 (46 Pa.B. 7668).  The parameters outline the requirements necessary for 2017 Industrial Hemp Research Pilot Program permit applications.  According to PDA, all applications must be submitted to the department by January 6, 2017.

Fruit Production: Pennsylvania Terminates Apple Marketing Program
On December 10, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin that the Pennsylvania Apple Marketing Program will be terminated on May 26, 2017 (46 Pa.B. 7677).  From October 17—31, 2016, a referendum was held among eligible producers to determine if a majority wished the Program to continue for an additional 5 years.  According to the notice, the eligible producers voted 56% to 44% against continuation of the program. 

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks
Recent AgLaw HotLinks include:

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the Friday Recap which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here

Thursday, October 8, 2015

Sentencing for Peanut Paste Salmonella Outbreak Continues

Written by Tyler R. Etter

On October 1, 2015, two former Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) employees were sentenced for
their part in the shipping of tainted peanut paste that caused a salmonella outbreak. The sentenced
employees were Samuel Lightsey and Daniel Kilgore, both former operations managers at PCA’s Blakley,
Georgia plant. The two were sentenced to 36 and 72 months in prison respectively, each followed by
three years of supervised release.

The 2008-2009 outbreak occurred across 46 states, with over 700 individuals falling ill. PCA has shipped
contaminated products, either before receiving test results or falsifying the tests. The prosecution has
been focused on the officials for conspiracy to defraud. Both Kilgore and Lightsey pleaded guilty to
conspiracy, mail and wire fraud, and the sale of misbranded and adulterated food.

On the same day, the victims of the outbreak urged the full funding of the Food and Drug
Administration’s (FDA) food safety program. The letter to Congress was signed by six families affected by
the outbreak, four of whom had lost a family member. The letter urged Congress to allocate $109.5
million to the FDA to fund the program designed to prevent a similar outbreak.

The families of the victims from the outbreak were instrumental in the passing of the Food Safety
Modernization Act. The families stated that without proper funding, “the law’s potential will be
squandered, and families such as ours will continue to be put at needless risk...” The current bills in the
House and Senate are proposing less than half of the requested budget for the food program.

Monday, October 5, 2015

Food Groups Petition for FDA Rule Change for Breaker Eggs

Written by Katharine Richter

On September 29, 2015, The National Chicken Council (NCC), Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), and Association for Dressings and Sauces (ADS) wrote a petition to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking “to amend the Final Rule on Prevention of Salmonella Enteritidis in Shell Eggs During Production, Storage, and Transportation, published July 9, 2009 [74 FR 33030].”

The rule requires that any eggs being sent to breaking facilities, which will eventually be pasteurized, must be “kept at 45 degrees F within 36 hours after being laid.”  The NCC originally challenged the rule when it was being proposed in 2010 because the FDA never explained the additional health benefits from requiring the refrigeration and the petition argues there is “no additional food safety value.”  The refrigeration requirements effectively made broiler hatcheries dispose of all excess eggs, which the NCC estimated was around 365 million eggs last year.  Prior to the rule, broiler hatcheries could sell excess eggs they had due to fluctuating market demands.  The excess eggs were sold as “breaker eggs” (eggs broken and sold in liquid form).  With the enactment of the rule, the broiler farms could not sell the excess eggs because they failed to meet the refrigeration requirements.


The petition comes at a time when egg prices have “more than doubled in the period following the HPAI outbreak.”  Many companies have felt the price increase.  The petition states that, “Industry experts estimate that the price of a dozen breaker eggs rose dramatically from 63 cents in late April to $2.15 in early June.”  The petition argues changing the rule to either make breaker eggs exempt from the refrigeration requirement or increasing the refrigeration requirement to 120 hours after being laid, would help meet market demands and stop the need to import eggs from other countries.

Friday, September 25, 2015

Jail Times for Egg Crimes

Written by Stephen Kenney
On June 3, 2014, Austin “Jack” DeCoster and Peter DeCoster pled guilty in Federal Court to their connection with the “distribution of adulterated eggs in interstate commerce.”  The father and son officially pled guilty to one count of bribery of a public official, one count of introducing a misbranded food into interstate commerce with intent to defraud, and one count of introducing adulterated food into interstate commerce.  They were charged after it was found that a nationwide Salmonella outbreak was linked to their Iowa based company, Quality Egg LLC.  The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that nearly 2,000 people were sickened by the outbreak that was linked to the company’s eggs. They were sentenced three months in jail and one year of supervised probation along with fines.

The government’s memorandum regarding sentencing noted that Quality Egg had disregarded safety standards and practices for years and had misled major customers, including Walmart, about the LLC’s food safety practices.  On April 13, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Mark W. Bennett sentenced the father and son to three months in prison and one year of probation. 

The family and LLC paid $7 million in fines in April, but are appealing the prison sentence.  The appeal will be heard by the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in St. Louis.  The Department of Justice filed a 60 pagebrief on September 18, 2015, in support of the prison sentences.  The brief states that Quality Egg was “producing SE positive eggs” at a rate of contamination “approximately 39 times higher than the current national incidence rate.”  The barn facilities were also found to be extremely contaminated with “63 percent of the wash water, feed samples, feed ingredients and pullet houses showing widespread SE contamination.” 


The DeCosters argue that incarceration would be unconstitutional because neither man had any knowledge of the violations.  They argue that the sentences would be based on “strict liability” which would violate the Due Process Clause and the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution.  The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from imposing cruel and unusual punishments. 

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

First Cucumber Salmonella Lawsuit Filed

Written by Katharine Richter  

On September 7, 2015, the first lawsuit related to a Salmonella outbreak that occurred due to tainted cucumbers distributed by Andrew & Williamson Fresh Produce Inc. was filed by Marler Clark law firm on behalf of Kathleen Dvergsten in the Minnesota United States District Court.

Kathleen Dvergsten of Minnesota allegedly contracted Salmonella after eating a contaminated salad at a Red Lobster on August 11, 2015.  According to filed complaint, the plaintiff was hospitalized from August 14 to August 20, where she was treated for Salmonella.  According to Marler Clark law firm press release, “285 people from 27 states [became] ill from eating Mexican-grown cucumbers imported by California company [Andrew & Williamson].”


The causes of action being brought against Andrew & Williamson Fresh Produce Inc. are strict liability, breach of warranty, negligence, and negligence per se.

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Almond Board of California Approves New Pasteurizing Process

Written by Tyler R. Etter

In August of 2015, the Almond Board of California’s Technical Expert Review Panel approved a new chemical-free pasteurization process to eliminate pathogens such as salmonella. The process was created by RF Biocidics for the Ready Roast Nut Company.

The need for pasteurization of almonds arose with outbreaks of salmonella in the years of 2001 and 2004 from unpasteurized almonds. However, the current chemical process using propylene oxide cannot be used for organic almonds. The CEO of RF Biocidics considers the process to be a breakthrough not only for the company, but also for the industry as a whole, due to the non-chemical nature of the process.

Traditionally the pasteurization process has used steam treatments or chemical processes such as propylene oxide usage, but these processes can impact the nutritional qualities of the product. The APEX system designed by RF Biocidics uses a process called “volumetric heating” that utilizes radio waves to increase the metabolism of the cells, killing bacteria, molds, and other pests and pathogens.


The APEX machines start at $1 million, with a base processing level of 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per hour.

Monday, July 23, 2012

New FDA Egg Rule Becomes Effective

On July 9, 2012, a new federal rule regulating medium-sized egg producers went into effect.  The rule was formulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an effort to reduce the risk of Salmonella Enteritidis in shell eggs.  As a result, egg operations with between 3,000 and 50,000 laying hens must now comply with FDA monitoring, cleaning, testing, and recordkeeping guidelines.  Large-sized egg producers with more than 50,000 laying hens have been required to comply with the FDA rule since 2010.

For more information regarding the new FDA egg rule, please click the link below:


Written by M. Sean High, Research Assistant
Penn State Law, Agricultural Law Center