Showing posts with label Pilgrim's Pride. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pilgrim's Pride. Show all posts

Thursday, June 2, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—June 2, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Water: SCOTUS Holds Landowners may Challenge WOTUS Determinations in Court
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States held that landowners have the ability to bring legal action against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) determinations regarding whether a particular piece of property contains waters of the United States (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. Inc.).  According to the Court, a Corps issued waters of the United States “revised jurisdictional determination” is a “final agency action” that provides no other “adequate alternative to challenging it in court.”

Food Safety: FDA Publishes FSMA Final Rule for Food Facility Hazards
On May 27, 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register of a final rule entitled Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food against Intentional Adulteration (81 FR 34165).  According to FDA, the department “is issuing this final rule to require domestic and foreign food facilities that are required to register under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) to address hazards that may be introduced with the intention to cause wide scale public health harm.” The final rule becomes effective July 26, 2016.

Labor: DOL Sues Pilgrim’s Pride for Alleged Hiring Discrimination
On May 25, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a press release announcing that the agency’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs has filed a lawsuit with the Office of Administrative Law Judges “alleging that Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. has systematically discriminated against female, African American and white jobseekers at its Mount Pleasant processing facility.” According to the press release, Pilgrim’s Pride currently holds federal contracts in excess of $75 million and the company’s alleged actions violated Executive Order 11246 which “prohibits federal contractors from discriminating in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or national origin, and requires contractors to ensure equal opportunity in employment.”

Food Safety: Group Files Suit Seeking FDA Regulation of Oysters
On May 25, 2016 the organization Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) filed a complaint against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding CSPI’s 2012 citizen petition filed with FDA asking the agency to establish a performance standard that would ensure levels of the bacteria Vibrio vulnificus “are nondetectable in oysters and other molluscan shell fish sold for raw consumption.” According to the complaint, CSPI seeks court “declaration that [FDA] has acted unlawfully by withholding action on CSPI’s petition and an order requiring [FDA] to act.”

Animal Health: Report Examines Effect of HPAI on Local Economies
The May 2016 issue of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association’s Choices magazine contained a report assessing the economic effect of the 2014-2015 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreak in the United States.  According to the report, “[a]n initial assessment of the local consequences suggests the outcomes from the HPAI outbreak resulted in fewer jobs, lower output, lower value-added, and decreased local, state, and Federal tax receipts.” The report stated that “[a]pproximately $879 million was spent on the 2014-2015 HPAI outbreak and Fall planning activities…[a]pproximately $200 million of the total mitigation expenditures were indemnity payments…to farmers, growers, and companies, $610 million to response activities on premises…$34 million on Fall planning costs, and the remaining $35 million likely applied to overtime, travel, and supplies for Veterinary Services’ employees.”

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 28, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Litigation: Court Rejects Contract Grower Claims against Pilgrim’s Pride
On April 22, 2016, the United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division granted summary judgement and dismissed claims brought by more than 200 poultry growers alleging that Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (PPC) violated the Packers and Stockyards Act (PSA) by closing two processing facilities (Sheila Adams, et al, v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 2016 WL 1615700).  The court disagreed with the poultry growers’ assertion that PPC’s facility closures had violated PSA through an attempt to increase prices by keeping as much chicken off the market as possible.

GMO Ingredients: Court Permits Chipotle Advertisement Lawsuit to Move Forward
On April 20, 2016, the United States District Court Southern District of Florida ruled that a class action lawsuit, alleging that Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Chipotle) “misrepresented to customers that its food products contain only non-GMO products,” may proceed (Reilly v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Case No. 15-Civ-23425-COOKE-TORRES).  Specifically, the court stated that the plaintiffs are permitted to proceed with their “allegation that Chipotle’s ‘Non-GMO’ claims ‘mislead consumers into paying a premium price…for inferior products or undesirable ingredients or for products that contain ingredients that are not disclosed.”

Equine Disease: PDA Quarantines Barn after Horse Tests Positive for Equine Infections Anemia
On April 20, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) issued a press release announcing the quarantine “of an equine barn in Halifax, Dauphin County, after a horse at the barn tested positive for Equine Infectious Anemia (EIA) on Monday, April 18.”  According to PDA, both the barn and the horses will be quarantined for at least 60 days.  PDA further stated that EIA poses no health threat to humans and that “[t]he quarantine can be lifted after the remaining horses are determined not to be infected.”

Contract Review: USDA to Continue Payments for Pork Trademarks
On April 20, 2016, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) announced that the agency “has completed its review of the 2006 asset purchase agreement between the National Pork Board and the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) for the purchase of four trademarks…[which] include the word ‘pork’ in distinctive lettering set against a pork loin silhouette and ‘The Other White Meat’ in various forms.”  According to USDA, “[a]s a result [of the review], AMS is approving continuing annual payments of $3 million under the terms of the agreement.”

Department Structure: PDA Announces Reorganization
On April 23, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin that “[t]he Executive Board approved a reorganization of the Department of Agriculture effective April 4, 2016” (46 Pa.B. 20165).  Of note, “at the request of the Joint Committee on Documents under 1 Pa. Code § 3.1(a)(9) (relating to contents of Code)” PDA’s reorganization is published through the use of an organizational chart.   

Regulation: USDA Proposes Amendment to Voluntary Grading of Shell Eggs
On April 20, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service published notice in the Federal Register that the agency was “propos[ing] to amend the Regulations Governing the Voluntary Grading of Shell Eggs to clarify the definition of ‘condition’ and revise the prerequisite requirement for shell eggs eligible for voluntary USDA grading and certification” (81 FR 23188).  The comment period for the proposed rule closes June 20, 2016.