Showing posts with label Horse Slaughter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Horse Slaughter. Show all posts

Friday, February 12, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review: February 12, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Avian Influenza: New HPAI Indemnity Rules become Effective
On February 9, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) published in the Federal Register an interim rule amending the regulations governing the payment of indemnity claims for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) (81 FR 6745).  The new regulations became effective upon the interim rule’s February 9, 2016 publication in the Federal Register and amend the previous HPAI indemnity regulations to: 1) allow indemnity payments to be split between poultry/egg owners and contractors; 2) clarify that eggs are eligible for indemnity payments; and 3) require that owners and contractors of large facilities provide statements that prior to the detection of HPAI in their facility, they had in place, and were following, a biosecurity plan.  For more information see previous Penn State Agricultural Law Blog post.

Labeling: House Votes to Make Menu Labeling Less Stringent
On February 12, 2016, the United States House of Representatives voted 266 – 144 to pass the Common Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act of 2015 (H.R. 2017), which would make less stringent the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) menu labeling requirements for nutrition information displayed  by certain food establishments (such as restaurants, pizza shops, supermarkets, and convenience stores).  Significantly, on February 10, 2016, the Obama administration issued a press release opposing H.R. 2017, stating that if enacted, the legislation “would reduce consumers' access to nutrition information…likely create consumer confusion…[and] create unnecessary delays in the implementation of menu labeling.”

Avian Influenza: Indiana Animal Health Officials Set Date to Remove HPAI Restrictions
On February 4, 2016, the Indiana State Board of Animal Health issued a press release announcing the lifting of certain restrictions that had been in place since a January outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) within the state.  According to the press release, provided that no new HPAI tests are reported, the state “expects to release the 10-km control area and the additional 10-km surveillance zone on Monday, Feb. 22.” The quarantines on infected sites, however, will continue “until final site-cleanup requirements are met.”

Animal Welfare: Judge Blocks Horse Slaughter and Sale of Horsemeat in New Mexico
On February 4, 2016, New Mexico District Judge Francis J. Mathew issued a Stipulated Final Order permanently enjoining Defendants Valley Meat Company, LLC, Dairyland Packing, Inc., Mountain View Packing, LLC, and Richard De Los Santos, non-parties Jose Hernandez, Ryoichi Okubo, and D’Allende Meats, LLC, “from slaughter horses for human consumption, and from manufacturing, selling or distributing horsemeat products for human consumption in New Mexico.”  The case was brought against the Defendants by New Mexico Attorney General Hector H. Balderas. 

Crop Insurance: Kentucky Farmer Sentenced for Crop Insurance Fraud
On February 2, 2016, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Kentucky issued a press release announcing that Kentucky farmer Tracy E. Dillard “was sentenced by United States District Judge Greg N. Stivers, to serve eight months in prison followed by a three year term of supervised release and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $711,958.00 for committing crop insurance fraud.”  According to the press release, Dillard had previously admitted in court to “knowingly making false statements and reports on insurance claims submitted to Producers Agriculture Insurance Company, a company insured by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC).”

GMOs: Kenya Approves Limited Release of GM Maize Seeds
On February 9, 2016, Kenya’s National Biosafety Authority “granted a conditional approval only for environmental release for the purpose of conducting National Performance Trials (NPTs) and collecting compositional analysis data but not for cultivation, importation or placing on the market of the Bt Maize.” Bt Maize (MON810) is a Monsanto produced, genetically modified, insect-protected corn hybrid.

Food Safety: Slaughterhouse Owner Sentenced for Selling Condemned and Uninspected Cattle
On February 11, 2016, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California issued a press release announcing that “Jesse ‘Babe’ Amaral, Jr., owner of the now-defunct Petaluma slaughterhouse Rancho Feeding Corporation, was sentenced today to 12 months and one day of imprisonment for leading a conspiracy to distribute adulterated, misbranded, and uninspected meat.” In addition to the aforementioned prison time, United States District Judge Charles R Breyer also sentenced Amaral “to two years’ supervised release, one of which will be served in a residential re-entry facility.”

Monday, November 11, 2013

New Mexico District Court Dismisses Horse Slaughter Lawsuit, 10th Circuit Issues Emergency Injunction on Appeal

On November 1, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Humane Society of the United States seeking to prevent horse slaughter inspections. HSUS alleged that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) failed to conduct proper environmental studies when it issued grants of inspection for federal meat inspection services to Valley Meat Co., Rains Natural Meat, and Responsible Transportation.  The court stated that the Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) Directive 6130.1 and drug residue program did not require the agency to prepare an environmental impact statement, an environmental assessment, or a categorical exclusion under NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act). The court further concluded that the issuing of a grant of inspection is a mandatory act not subject to NEPA review.

HSUS filed an immediate appeal with the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit issued an emergency injunction to prevent the USDA from performing inspections and halted the slaughter facilities from operating once more.


For more information, please see the full opinion issued by Judge Christina Armijo in the District Court of New Mexico.

Written by Sarah L. Doyle - Research Assistant 
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
@PSUAgLawCenter
November 11, 2013

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Judge Temporarily Halts the Opening of Horse Slaughterhouses in New Mexico and Iowa

On August 2, U.S. District Judge Christina Armijo issued a temporary restraining order against two slaughterhouses, in Iowa and New Mexico, which were set to begin the slaughter of horses next week.  The lawsuit, brought by the Humane Society of the United States, and several other organizations, contended that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) failed to do the proper environmental impact studies before issuing the permits which would allow the companies in Iowa and New Mexico to open the horse slaughterhouses.  The injunction will remain in place for 30 days, after which the court will decide whether to extend the order for a longer period of time.

The USDA gave these slaughterhouses the go-ahead to begin horse slaughter in June.  According to the USDA, Congress prohibited the use of Federal funding for equine slaughter inspections in 2006, but did not continue the prohibition in its FY 2012 Agriculture Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 112-55).  Therefore, if a slaughterhouse meets all FSIS regulations for equine slaughter, the FSIS must grant Federal inspection to the facility.

For more information, please see the USDA’s Humane Slaughter page or FSIS’ Information Regarding Horse Slaughter page.

Written By Gaby Gilbeau – Research Assistant

The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center

@PSUAgLawCenter

August 6, 2013

Monday, July 8, 2013

Lawsuit Filed to Stop Horse Slaughter

On July 2, 2013, several animal welfare groups and individuals, in an effort to ban horse slaughter, filed a complaint against USDA in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. The suit was filed in response USDA’s grant of inspection to two horse slaughterhouses earlier this year. In 2007, Congress effectively banned horse slaughterhouses in the U.S. when funding for salaries of inspection personnel was eliminated. Without the inspection personnel, the required inspections could not be performed and horsemeat was not eligible for USDA approval. In 2011, Congress opened the door for horse slaughter in the U.S. by restoring funding for inspection personnel.

Plaintiffs in the suit are The Humane Society of the United States, Front Range Equine Rescues, Marin Humane Society, Horses for Life Foundation, Return to Freedom and five individuals (one from Missouri and four from New Mexico). Plaintiffs allege USDA violated the National Environmental Protection (NEPA) and Administrative Procedure Act by providing a grant of inspection to the new plants and establishing a new drug residue testing plan without conducting  an environmental review and producing an environmental impact statement. In the Complaint, Plaintiffs request the court declare the grants and drug residue testing plan unlawful, set aside the grants and enjoin the USDA from granting further inspections and from implementing new drug residue testing plans without an adequate NEPA review. The case is docketed at CV-13-3034.

Until horse slaughter is banned, USDA must provide grants of inspection if a horse slaughterhouse meets inspection requirements. Recently, the House and the Senate voted to cut funding which would eliminate horse slaughter in 2014. In addition, the Safeguard American Food Exports (SAFE) Act, which would not only ban horse slaughter in the U.S. but also ban the shipment of horses across the border for slaughter, was introduced by the House, H.R. 1094 and the Senate, S. 541, in March. 
For more information on this topic, please see USDA’s and The Humane Society of the United States’ websites.
Written by Clara E. Conklin - Research Assistant
The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
July 8, 2013

Monday, June 17, 2013

House Appropriations Committee Approves 2014 Agriculture Appropriations Bill


On June 13, 2013, the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee approved amendments to the Agriculture Appropriations Bill. The bill totals $19.5 billion in discretionary funding, which is $1.3 billion less than last year’s appropriations, and about the same as the current level of spending due to sequestration. The amendments include prohibiting funding for the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) implementation of regulations that would impact livestock producers, as well as prohibiting funding for inspection of horse slaughter facilities in the U.S.

Next, the bill will be considered by the full House.

For a complete list of the amendments and their sponsors, please visit the Committee on Appropriations website.

Written by Sarah Doyle – Research Assistant

The Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center

June 17, 2013