Showing posts with label GIPSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GIPSA. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 22, 2017

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

FSMA: FDA Announces Small Entity Compliance Guide for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
On November 22, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the availability of guidance material designed to help small businesses comply with the Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food final rule (82 FR 55503).  Entitled: Guidance for Industry: Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food: What You Need to Know About the FDA Regulation - Small Entity Compliance Guide, the guide provides affected shippers, loaders, carriers, and receivers with compliance information regarding such issues as training and record keeping.  While not legally enforceable, the guide expresses FDA’s current thinking on the issue.    

WOTUS: EPA and the Army Propose Amending Applicable Date of “Waters of the United States” Rule
On November 22, 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army published notice of a proposed amendment that would delay the applicable date for the 2015 rule defining the “waters of the United States” (82 FR 55542). Accordingly, the agencies seek to delay the applicable date of the rule until two years after the proposed amendment has been finalized and published in the Federal Register.  The agencies stated that the delay is intended to permit sufficient time for the proper reconsideration of the definition of the “waters of the United States.” Comments regarding the proposed amendment must be received on or before December 13, 2017.

GIPSA: USDA Eliminates GIPSA as a Standalone Agency
On November 15, 2017, Agri-Pulse reported that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has eliminated the Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) as a standalone agency.  Under a memorandum issued by Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue, USDA announced that those functions which were formerly part of GIPSA have been moved to a newly created Fair Trade Practices program area.  According to the memorandum, the intention of the action is to improve industry engagement and customer focus.  

Animal Welfare: Utah Agrees to $349,000 “Ag-Gag” Settlement
On November 18, 2017, the Salt Lake Tribune reported that Utah’s office of attorney general has agreed to pay $349,000 to settle a lawsuit involving the state’s “ag-gag” law.  The settlement follows a July 7, 2017, ruling by the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division which held that Utah Code §76-6-112 violated first amendment rights to free speech.  According to the report, the settlement amount must be approved by the Utah legislature.

Transportation: FMCSA Announces 90-Day ELD Waiver for Agricultural Commodities
On November 20, 2017, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) announced a 90-day temporary waiver from the electronic logging device (ELD) requirements for transporters of agricultural commodities.  Prior to the FMCSA announcement, ELD requirements were scheduled to take effect December 18, 2017.  In addition to the 90-day temporary waiver, FMCSA also announced that the agency will be providing “formal guidance specifically pertaining to the existing Hours-of-Service exemption for the agricultural industry, and guidance on the “personal conveyance” provision.”

Pennsylvania Legislation
HB 176 Legislation exempting certain agricultural structures from the Uniform Construction Code (Approved by Governor Tom Wolf October 25, 2017) (Act 35)

Agricultural and Rural Affairs (H)
HB 1932 Legislation requiring a 90 day written decision regarding the approval, modification, or disapproval of a nutrient management plan (Referred to committee November 20, 2017)

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices
Milk Marketing Board

AgLaw HotLinks:

 Listen to our new Agricultural Law Podcast by clicking here!

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—October 19, 2017

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

GIPSA: USDA Withdraws Proposed GIPSA Rule
On October 18, 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) published notice in the Federal Register that the agency was withdrawing the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) rule proposed on December 20, 2016 (82 FR 48603).  According to the USDA, the proposed rule was intended to clarify unfair, unjust, or deceptive practices and to determine when such practices resulted in unfair advantages for packers, swine contractors, or live poultry dealers.  The USDA stated that as a result of withdrawing the proposed rule, the agency will continue the approach of determining “unfair and deceptive practices on a case-by-case basis.”

Immigration: DOJ and DOS Announce Partnership to Fight Visa Fraud
On October 11, 2017, the U.S. Departments of Justice (DOJ) and State (DOS) announced a formal partnership between the two agencies for the purpose of fighting employer visa fraud.  According to the announcement, the agreement provides for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division and the DOS’s Bureau of Consular Affairs to share information on employers who may be “engaging in unlawful discrimination, committing fraud, or making other misrepresentations in their use of employment-based visas, such as H-1B, H-2A, and H-2B visas.” According to the DOJ, the goal of the partnership is to hold accountable those employers that discriminate against U.S. workers through the favoring of foreign visa workers.  

Pesticides: EPA Announces Label Changes for Dicamba Use
On October 13, 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the agency has reached a voluntary agreement with Monsanto, BASF and DuPont to provide new label requirements for dicamba application to growing plants.  Known as "over the top" use, under the new requirements, labels will state: (1) application is permitted only by certified applicators, (2) farmers must maintain specific records, (3) application is limited wind speeds below 10 mph, (4) application is limited to certain times during the day, (5) tank clean-out language, and (6) language regarding enhanced susceptible crops and record keeping with sensitive crop registries.  The EPA stated that the manufacturers have agreed to have the new labeling ready for use in the 2018 season.

Chesapeake Bay: Pennsylvania Announces Hundreds of Farmers to Receive Reimbursement for Clean Water Plans
On October 13, 2017, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) announced plans to reimburse a minimum of 800 Pennsylvania farmers for the cost of preparing agricultural plans for clean water.  According to the DEP, in an effort to help the Commonwealth meet the Environmental Protection Agency’s water pollution mandated targets for the Chesapeake Bay, state law requires that farmers implement one of the following: (1) a manure management plan, (2) a nutrient management plan, or (3) an agriculture erosion and sediment control plan.  Additionally, in certain circumstances, a farmer may be required to implement more than one of these plans.  Costs to prepare the various plans can range from $500 to $1,500 depending on the size of the farm.  The DEP asserted that while a minimum of 800 plans will be reimbursed, the department could potentially cover the costs of 2,200 plans.  The DEP stated that farmers are eligible for reimbursed for plans developed after January 1, 2017.

Soda Tax: Cook County Illinois Repeals Soda Tax
On October 11, 2017, the Chicago Sun Times reported that the Cook County Board of Commissioners voted 15-2 to repeal the county’s 1 cent an ounce tax on sweetened beverages.  Passed in November 2016, the sweetened beverage tax went into effect August 2, 2017.  According to the article, the elimination of the sweetened beverage tax will result in anticipated $200 million budget short-fall for the county, which includes the city of Chicago.

Pennsylvania Legislation
Pennsylvania Senate
  • HB 790  Controlled Plant and Noxious Weed Act (amended on third consideration by Senate, October 17, 2018)


Environmental Resources and Energy (S)
  • SB 799 Legislation to create a program for Pennsylvania municipalities and municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) to meet their taxpayer funded Chesapeake Bay nutrient reduction mandates (reported for first consideration by Senate, October 17, 2017)


Agriculture and Rural Affairs (H) and Agriculture and Rural Affairs (S)
  • Joint informational meeting on Spotted Lanternfly (October 18, 2017)


Pennsylvania Actions and Notices
State Horse Racing Commission

 AgLaw HotLinks:


Listen to our new Agricultural Law Podcast by clicking here!

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 13, 2017

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Right to Farm: PA Court Rules on Application and Storage of Wastewater
On April 4, 2017, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled on a case involving a neighbor nuisance suit and the Pennsylvania Right to Farm (RTF) law (Branton v. Nicholas Meat, LLC, 2017 PA Super 88 No. 536 MDA 2016).  The court determined that so long as an agricultural operation “substantially complies with relevant federal, state, and local laws” the agricultural operation still meets RTF’s “lawful” requirement.  Accordingly, the court stated that “a lawful use is not rendered unlawful simply because an owner may have been cited for an infraction for noncompliance in connection with the use.” Additionally, the court held that both the application and storage of food processing waste are normal agricultural operations under RTF.  The court determined, however, that the construction of a 2,400,000 gallon storage tank was a “substantial change” to the agricultural operation.  As a result, because the neighbors brought suit within one year of the change, the case was not barred under RTF.

Packers and Stockyards Act: GIPSA Rule Enforcement is Delayed Six Months  
On April 12, 2017, the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) published notice in the Federal Register that the agency “is delaying the effective date of the rule published on December 20, 2016, for an additional six months to October 19, 2017” (82 FR 17531).  According to GIPSA, the “rule addresses the scope of sections 202(a) and (b) of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921” (81 FR 92566).  GIPSA stated that the delay in the rule’s effective date is “in response to a comment received from a national general farm organization that requested an extension of time and to allow time for further consideration by USDA.”

Litigation: “Pink Slime” Case Moves to Trial
On April 5, 2017, Reuters reported that “ABC Broadcasting has lost a last-ditch bid before South Dakota’s highest court to avoid a trial in a beef producer’s $5.7 billion defamation case over reports about a product that critics call ‘pink slime.’” According to Reuters, Beef Products Inc. (BPI) produces “[l]ean, finely textured beef [which] is made from beef chunks, including trimmings and exposed to tiny bursts of ammonium hydroxide to kill bacteria.”  BPI’s suit alleges that the company was damaged when ABC referred to “BPI’s “lean finely textured beef” product as "pink slime."  Reuters stated that with the recent ruling, the trial is scheduled to begin on June 5, 2017.

Biosecurity: Public Meetings Scheduled Regarding Animal Disease Traceability
On April 3, 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced that the agency will hold “a series of public meetings to receive input on the current Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) system.” According to APHIS, “[t]he meetings will allow APHIS to hear from the public about the successes and challenges of the current ADT framework, specifically for traceability in cattle and bison.”  The meetings are scheduled for the following dates and locations:
April 11: Oklahoma City, OK
April 13: Riverdale, MD
April 20: Nashville, TN
May 2: Bloomington, MN
May 4: Denver, CO
May 11: Rancho Cordova, CA
May 24: Billings, MT  

Federal Administrative Actions and Notices:
Agricultural Department

Environmental Protection Agency

Farm Credit

Food & Drug Administration

Pennsylvania Administrative Actions and Notices:
Department of Environmental Protection

Pennsylvania Legislation:
Senate Agricultural and Rural Affairs
SB 567: Controlled Plant and Noxious Weed Act

AgLaw HotLinks:

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.


Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—February 9, 2017

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Organic: AMS to Delay Organic Livestock and Poultry Effective Date
On February 8, 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) announced that the effective date of the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices final rule, published on January 19, 2017, has been delayed from March 20, 2017, to May 19, 2017.  The new requirements cover livestock handling and transport for slaughter, avian living conditions, livestock care and production practices, and mammalian living conditions.  According to AMS, the delay is the result of the January 20, 2017, Memorandum from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled, Regulatory Freeze Pending Review

GIPSA: USDA Announces Comment Extension for Unfair Practices and Undue Preferences Violations
On February 7, 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) announced a 30 day extension of the proposed rule—published at 81 FR 92723—“clarify[ing] the conduct or action by packers, swine contractors, or live poultry dealers that GIPSA considers unfair, unjustly discriminatory.  The comment period now closes on March 24, 2017. According to GIPSA, the delay is the result of the January 20, 2017, Memorandum from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled, Regulatory Freeze Pending Review

GIPSA: USDA Announces Extension of Comment Period for Poultry Grower Ranking System  
On February 7, 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) announced a 30 day extension of the proposed rule published at 81 FR 92723.  The proposed rule “identifies criteria that the Secretary may consider when determining whether a live poultry dealer's use of a poultry grower ranking system for ranking poultry growers for settlement purposes is unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive or gives an undue or unreasonable preference, advantage, prejudice, or disadvantage.” The comment period now closes on March 24, 2017.  According to GIPSA, the delay is the result of the January 20, 2017, Memorandum from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled, Regulatory Freeze Pending Review 

Food Safety: FAO Issues Food Chain Crisis Management Document
In February 2017, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) released a publication entitled Averting Risks to the Food Chain.  The purpose of the document is to “prevent animal disease, plant pest outbreaks, and food safety incidents before they occur.” According to FAO, the intended use of the document is to assist “experts, policy makers, national institutions, and development workers” in the pursuit of ending world hunger.

AgLaw HotLinks:


Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.


Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 15, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

GIPSA: USDA Announces Updated Farmer Fair Practices Rules
On December 14, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) announced updated changes to the Farmer Fair Practices Rules.  According to USDA, the new regulations—contained in an interim final rule and two proposed rules—are intended to “level the playing field for farmers by proposing protections against the most egregious retaliatory practices harming chicken growers.” Relatedly, House Committee on Agricultural Chairman K. Michael Conaway (R-TX) issued a statement the he “will make it a priority to roll back these, and other midnight regulations from the Obama Administration, as soon as Congress returns in January.”  

FSMA: FDA Publishes Guidance for Voluntary Third-Party Certification
On December 6, 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published notice in the Federal Register “announcing the availability of a guidance for industry and FDA staff entitled ‘Third-Party Certification Body Accreditation for Food Safety Audits: Model Accreditation Standards’” (81 FR 88099).  The guidance contains non-binding “FDA recommendations on third-party certification body qualifications for accreditation to conduct food safety audits and to issue food and/or facility certifications under an FDA program required by the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).”

Litigation: Court Rules FDA did not Negligently Issue Salmonella Warning
On December 2, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld a district court ruling that the United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) did not negligently issue a 2008 warning that certain types of raw red tomatoes were likely contamination with Salmonella Saintpaul (Seaside Farm, Inc., v. United States of America, 2016 WL 7030629).  According to the court, shortly after the warning was issued, it was determined that the outbreak did not result from tomatoes, but from jalapeƱo and serrano peppers imported from Mexico.  The plaintiff, Seaside Farms, alleged that FDA’s warning was negligent and devalued its tomato crop by $15,036,293.95.  The court determined that the warning properly fell within the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act and that the district court “ruling was essential to protect FDA’s vital role in safeguarding the public food supply.”

SNAP: USDA Announces Final Rule for Retail Establishments
On December 8, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) issued a news release announcing a final rule entitled Enhancing Retailer Standards in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).  According to FNS, the final rule amends the SNAP retailer eligibility criteria to require that authorized SNAP retail food establishments must “offer a larger inventory and variety of healthy food options.” Additionally, FNS stated that the final rule provides changes to the definition of the term “accessory food” so as to “ensure that stores are not able to participate in SNAP by selling primarily snack foods.”

Class Action: Post Holdings Announces Settlement of Egg Price-Fixing Claims
On December 8, 2016, Post Holdings announced that the company has agreed to pay $75 million to settle claims, asserted by direct purchasers of shell eggs against Michael Foods, Inc., for allegedly conspiring to inflate egg prices (In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, Case Number  2:08-md-02002).  Filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in 2008, the litigation predates Post Holdings acquisition of Michael Foods in 2014.  According to Post Holdings, “the terms of the settlement must be formally documented and are subject to approval by the court following notice to all class members.”

Industrial Hemp: 2017 Pilot Program Parameters Announced
On December 10, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin announcing the Industrial Hemp Research Pilot Program parameters for 2017 (46 Pa.B. 7668).  The parameters outline the requirements necessary for 2017 Industrial Hemp Research Pilot Program permit applications.  According to PDA, all applications must be submitted to the department by January 6, 2017.

Fruit Production: Pennsylvania Terminates Apple Marketing Program
On December 10, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin that the Pennsylvania Apple Marketing Program will be terminated on May 26, 2017 (46 Pa.B. 7677).  From October 17—31, 2016, a referendum was held among eligible producers to determine if a majority wished the Program to continue for an additional 5 years.  According to the notice, the eligible producers voted 56% to 44% against continuation of the program. 

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks
Recent AgLaw HotLinks include:

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the Friday Recap which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—October 20, 2016


Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Food: Court Dismisses Improper Influence Challenge to Dietary Guidelines
On October 12, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the dietary cholesterol recommendations in the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 8th Edition was the result of improper influence from the egg industry (Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Vilsack, Case No. 3:16-cv-00069).  According to the court, the plaintiff, Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, asserted that both the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) violated of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to prevent “special interest from inappropriately influencing the advisory committee that makes recommendations for updating national dietary guidelines.” The court dismissed the case due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction asserting that “the relevant law provides no meaningful standard by which the court can judge the agencies’ exercise of discretion.”

Dairy: Federal Lawmakers Request Assistance for Dairy Producers
On October 13, 2016, a bipartisan coalition of 56 members of the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives (including Senator Robert P. Casey Jr. PA-D and Representative Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson PA-R) issued a letter to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Shaun Donovan requesting resources to support the nation’s struggling dairy industry.  According to the letter, “[d]airy farmers have seen their income cut in half as farm milk prices have plunged by 40 percent since 2014…[w]ith market forecasts showing that dairy farmers will continue to face depressed prices.” The letter stated that Congress has already “asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture to take any and all actions to support U.S. dairy farmers…and we now ask [OMB] to do all you can to support the Secretary of Agriculture in this work.” 

Inspection: GIPSA Settles a Carcass Trim Procedure Case with Tyson Fresh Meats
On October 11, 2016, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) announced that the agency has entered into a Consent Decision with Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (Tyson) regarding Tyson’s failure to notify hog producers of a change in carcass trim procedures.  According to GIPSA, the failure to notify, which occurred at two of the company’s plants, resulted in Tyson paying a civil penalty of $22,500 and agreeing “to cease and desist from failing to disclose, or otherwise make known to hog producers, prior to purchase, a description of the carcass trim procedure to be used in determining the weight of producer’s hogs.” 

Animal Welfare: HSUS Files FTC Advertising Complaint against Davidson’s Eggs
On October 14, 2016, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) issued a press release stating that the organization has filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleging that National Pasteurized Eggs (which are sold nationally under the Davidson’s brand name) violated federal false advertising laws by misrepresenting how the company’s eggs are produced.  According to HSUS, “Davidson’s cartons prominently depict lush open pastures, a red barn and free-roaming hens—despite eggs in those cartons coming from birds permanently locked in cages so tightly they can’t even spread their wings.”  HSUS further stated that “[c]ontrary to the messaging conveyed on the packaging, these birds never feel sunlight nor touch a blade of grass.”

Final Rule: Agricultural Conservation Easement Program
On October 18, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) published notice in the Federal Register announcing of a final rule regarding implementation of the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP) (81 FR 71818).  According the notice, on February 27, 2015, NRCS published an interim rule and requested public comment regarding the implement of ACEP, which is a voluntary program to help farmers and ranchers preserve their agricultural land and restore, protect, and enhance wetlands on eligible lands. The notice stated that “NRCS received 1,055 comments from 102 respondents to the interim rule” and made adjustments to final rule, which became effective October 18, 2016.

PA Bulletin: Milk Marketing Board Hearing Announced
On October 15, 2016, the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (Board) published notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin that the Board “will conduct a public hearing for Milk Marketing Area No. 4 on December 8, 2016, at 10 a.m. in Room 202, Agriculture Building, 2301 North Cameron Street, Harrisburg, PA” (46 Pa.B. 6593).  According to the notice, “[t]he purpose of the hearing is to receive testimony and exhibits concerning cost replacement in Milk Marketing Area No. 4.”