Showing posts with label European Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European Commission. Show all posts

Thursday, October 31, 2019

Ag Law Weekly Review - October 31, 2019

Written by: 
Brook Duer —Staff Attorney
Audry Thompson—Research Assistant
           
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Industrial Hemp/Cannabis: USDA Releases Interim Final Rule for Domestic Hemp Production
On October 29, 2019, USDA publicly announced and released the text of its interim regulations governing domestic hemp production.  The interim final rule implements Section 10113 of the 2018 Farm Bill and various new sections of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, which it amended. Once published in the Federal Register, the rule will be immediately effective and expire after two years.  In the meantime, there will be a 60-day comment period and thereafter USDA anticipates issuing its final rule.  The rule adds new part 990 (“Domestic Hemp Production”) to 7 CFR. As stated in the 2018 Farm Bill, states wishing to have primary authority over hemp production must have a USDA-approved hemp production plan. Subpart B of new part 990 outlines the mandatory components and the approval and amendment processes for a state plan, as well as containing material provisions of interest regarding acreage reporting to states and FSA, grower data sharing with USDA, hemp sampling and THC testing, disposal of “hot” plants, and annual inspections.  In the absence of a USDA-approved plan, Subpart C governs hemp production through the application and issuance a USDA-issued hemp producer license and its compliance requirements.  Subpart E contains a provision stating that no state may prohibit the transportation of hemp or hemp products through their state if legally produced under federal law.  The interim final rule does not address import/export of seed or plant material or extracts, nor does it address seed certification. Those issues remain unchanged as presently regulated.

WOTUS:  Lawsuits Challenge Repeal of 2015 WOTUS Rule 
After the October 22, 2019, EPA repeal of the 2015 WOTUS Rule and simultaneous reinstitution of the pre-existing WOTUS regulatory framework dating to the 1980s, immediate legal action was taken by at least two interest groups to challenge that action. 
  • On October 22, 2019, the New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Association filed a lawsuit in New Mexico federal court claiming the reinstitution of the old regulatory framework was unconstitutional.  New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al., 1:19-cv-00988. The suit alleges, among other things, that: (a) the result of EPA’s action is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to an agency; (b) the term “navigable waters” should be declared void for vagueness; (c) the former interpretation and application of navigable waters was already rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2006 Rapanos v. U.S. case. 
  • On October 23, 2019, a collection of environmental groups filed a lawsuit in South Carolina federal court alleging that the repeal and reinstitution of the old rule violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and interpretative caselaw, in multiple ways and should be invalidated. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., 2:19-cv-03006. 
EPA’s repeal becomes effective December 23, 2019, and thus far no federal court has entertained or granted an injunction preventing the repeal from taking effect. 

Pesticides: EPA Proposes New Rule on Pesticide Application Exclusion Zone Requirements
On October 24, 2019, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposed rule to be published in the Federal Register revising the Application Exclusion Zone (AEZ) requirements of the Worker Protection Standard (WPS).  The AEZ refers to the area around an on-going pesticide application that acts as a buffer zone to prevent unnecessary human contact with the pesticide.  According to EPA, the proposed changes would limit an AEZ to the boundaries of a farmer’s own property, provide exemptions for immediate family members, simplify criteria for determining whether a 100-foot or a 25-foot AEZ should apply, and clarifies when to resume an application that has been suspended due to human entry into the AEZ.  In the announcement and proposed rule, EPA points out that persons outside a farm’s boundaries are still protected by the existing rule’s “do not contact” provisions prohibiting pesticide contact with all known persons, within or outside property lines.  Once published, a 90-day comment period will commence.    

Food Labeling: FDA States Enforcement Stance on New Nutrition Facts Labeling
On October 23, 2019, food manufacturers received information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding enforcement of the long-pending required amendment of  Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labeling (81 FR 33741) set to take effect for large manufacturers (total sales in excess of $10 million) on January 1, 2020.  In response to a September 30, 2019 letter from the Food & Beverage Issue Alliance (“Alliance”) requesting, among other things, a “six-month period of enforcement discretion,” FDA revised the compliance language on its webpage devoted to the new labeling to read: “During the first 6 months following the January 1, 2020, compliance date, FDA plans to work cooperatively with manufacturers to meet the new Nutrition Facts label requirements and will not focus on enforcement actions regarding these requirements during that time.”

Pesticides: EU Approves Ban of Another Neonicotinoid Harmful to Pollinators  
On October 22, 2019, the majority of European Union (EU) countries approved the proposal of the European Commission not to extend approval of the use of the pesticide thiacloprid after its current approval expires on April 30, 2020.  Thiacloprid is a neonicotinoid sold by Bayer CropScience under the brand name Biscaya, and has been linked to harm to pollinators.  A July 2019 EU notification to the World Trade Organization of the impending action also states that harmful effects on human health and groundwater cannot be ruled out.  According to Bloomberg News, Bayer CropScience submitted a letter to EPA in 2013 voluntarily canceling all its thiacloprid product registrations in the United States.  This is the fourth neonicotinoid to be banned for outdoor use in the EU. Thiacloprid use increased as a replacement for three previously banned neonicotinoids. Use of one remaining neonicotinoid, acetamiprid, is authorized in the EU but is characterized as relatively low toxicity.  

Farm Bill:  USDA, DOE Collaborate on Rural Energy Technology Development 
On October 25, 2019, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the execution of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) pursuant to Section 6501 of the 2018 Farm Bill to collaboratively promote investment in rural energy infrastructure and the development of energy-related technologies and manufacturing in rural and agricultural communities. An interagency working group is to be established to implement the MOU’s terms and prepare a yearly report of actions and projects.  This MOU results from the 2017 establishment of, and resulting report from, the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity, which recommended the development of all sources of energy including renewable sources to bolster rural prosperity. 

From National Ag Law Experts:
Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, Livestock and Community Property (October 28, 2019) 

Penn State Research:

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:

Pennsylvania Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices:
Department of Agriculture

Department of Environmental Protection

State Conservation Commission

Susquehanna River Basin Commission

Pennsylvania Legislature
H.B.1085 “An Act repealing the act of June 22, 1935 (P.L.414, No.182), known as the State Personal Property Tax Act” Presented to Governor (October 29, 2019)
S.B.147 “An Act amending Title 34 (Game) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in Pennsylvania Game Commission, further providing for accountability; and, in hunting and furtaking, further providing for hunting on Sunday prohibited and for trespass on private property while hunting and providing for hunting on Sunday without written permission,” Re-reported as Committed (October 29, 2019)

House Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee
H.B.918 “An Act repealing the act of May 20, 1857 (P.L.617, No.658), entitled ‘An act making an Appropriation from the State Treasury, in aid of the Farmers' High School,’” Committee Vote—Report Bill as Amended (October 23, 2019)
H.B.1223 “An Act providing for the creation of keystone opportunity dairy zones to facilitate the economic development of Pennsylvania's dairy industry; authorizing expenditures; providing tax exemptions, tax deductions, tax abatements and tax credits; creating additional obligations of the Commonwealth and local governmental units; and prescribing powers and duties of certain State and local departments, agencies and officials,” Committee Vote—Report Bill as Amended (October 23, 2019)
H.B.1224 “An Act amending the act of April 28, 1937 (P.L.417, No.105), known as the Milk Marketing Law, in purpose, short title and definitions, further providing for definitions and construction; in general powers of the board, providing for coordination with Department of Revenue; and, in prices of milk, further providing for cooperatives,” Committee Vote—Report Bill as Committed (October 23, 2019)
H.B.1775 “An Act amending the act of May 15, 1945 (P.L.547, No.217), known as the Conservation District Law, providing for legislative report,” Committee Vote—Report Bill as Amended (October 23, 2019)

Federal Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices:
Agricultural Marketing Service

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Delaware River Basin Commission

Environmental Protection Agency
“Mandipropamid; Pesticide Tolerances,” Final Rule (October 28, 2019)
“Sulfoxaflor; Pesticide Tolerances,” Final Rule (October 25, 2019)
“Fenbuconazole; Pesticide Tolerances,” Final Rule (October 25, 2019)

Fish and Wildlife Service

Food and Drug Administration

Food and Nutrition Service

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Partnerships and Public Engagement Office

U.S. House Agriculture Committee Actions: 
H.R.4885 “To amend Public Law 87-788 (commonly known as the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Act; 16 U.S.C. 582a-7) to provide for equal treatment of the District of Columbia with respect to funds made available under that Act,” Introduced; Referred to House Committee on Agriculture (October 28, 2019)             
H.R.4881 “To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ensure that consumers can make informed decisions in choosing between meat products such as beef and imitation meat products, and for other purposes,” Introduced; Referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce and Committee on Agriculture (October 28, 2019)
H.R.4874 “To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to establish the Rural Innovation and Partnership Administration and to amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to establish the Rural Future Partnership Fund to invest in the rural areas of the United States to achieve their preferred future while maximizing their contribution to the well-being of the United States, and for other purposes,” Introduced; Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Committee on Financial Services, and Energy and Commerce (October 28, 2019)
S.2107 “Protecting America's Food and Agriculture Act of 2019,” Referred to Committee on Homeland Security and Committee on Agriculture (October 28, 2019)
H.R.4820 “To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to provide assistance to manage farmer and rancher stress and for the mental health of individuals in rural areas, and for other purposes,” Introduced; Referred to House Committee on Agriculture (October 23, 2019)
H.R.4816 “To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to modify provisions relating to whistleblower incentives and protection, and for other purposes,” Introduced; Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Committee on Oversight and Reform (October 23, 2019)
H.R.4813 “To prohibit large platform utilities from being a financial institution or being affiliated with a person that is a financial institution, and for other purposes,” Introduced; Referred to Committee on Financial Services and Committee on Agriculture (October 23, 2019)
H.R.4642 “Community Broadband Mapping Act,” Referred to Subcommittee on Commodity Exchanges, Energy, and Credit (October 22, 2019)

U.S. Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry Committee Actions: 
S.2692 “A bill to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to improve direct certification, and for other purposes,” Introduced (October 24, 2019)
S.2695 “A bill to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide for the defense of United States agriculture and food through the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, and for other purposes,” Introduced (October 24, 2019)
S.2704 “A bill to amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to establish the Rural Innovation and Partnership Administration and to amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to establish the Rural Future Partnership Fund to invest in the rural areas of the United States to achieve their preferred future while maximizing their contribution to the well-being of the United States, and for other purposes,” Introduced (October 24, 2019)

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks:

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Want to get updates, but prefer to listen? Check out the Agricultural Law Podcast! We can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.

Review last month’s biggest legal developments in agriculture in the October 2019 Agricultural Law Brief. If you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe!

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 29, 2017

Written by M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Air Quality: Court Extends Date for Certain Farm Emission Reporting
On November 22, 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced  that the DC Circuit Court of Appeals has extended the initial reporting date for certain farms previously exempted from emission reporting requirements until January 22, 2018.  Accordingly, on April 11, 2017, the Court struck down an EPA final rule that had provided a complete agricultural exemption for reporting air emissions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as well as a partial agricultural exemption for reporting air emissions under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA).  EPA stated that the agency sought “additional time from the Court to delay the effective date so that EPA could develop guidance materials to help farmers understand their reporting obligations.” As a result, the Court allowed that farms affected by the April 11, 2017, decision will not be required to submit their initial reports until the Court orders its mandate enforcing the decision.  

Pesticides: EU Renews Glyphosate Approval
On November 27, 2017, the European Commission (EC) announced that the European Union (EU) Member States have agreed to renew the approval of the herbicide glyphosate for another 5 years.  According to the EC, the agreement was reached by a qualified majority of the Appeal Committee.  To achieve a qualified majority, a vote must be supported by 55% of the countries, representing at least 65% of the total EU population.  Accordingly, the EC reported that 18 Member States (representing 65.71% of the EU population) voted in favor of renewal, 9 Member States (representing 32.26 % of the EU population) voted against, and 1 Member State (representing 2.02 % of the EU population) abstained.

Pesticides: Pennsylvania Designates 19 Counties for Pesticide Disposal
On November 20, 2017, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) announced the 2018 list of counties designated for disposal of unwanted or unusable pesticides through the Commonwealth’s CHEMSWEEP program.  Under CHEMSWEEP, licensed pesticide applicators, pesticide dealers and commercial pesticide application businesses in designated counties have the ability to register for the collection and destruction of unwanted or unusable pesticides.  Each year, different counties receive designation for participation in the program.  For 2018, the designated counties are: Adams, Allegheny, Beaver, Cameron, Carbon, Centre, Chester, Clearfield, Clinton, Elk, Franklin, Jefferson, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Northampton, Pike, Potter, and Washington.  According to PDA, since the CHEMSWEEP program was established in 1993, over “2.5 million pounds of unwanted or unusable pesticides have been properly destroyed.”

Organics: USDA Issues Assessment on New EU Organic Regulations
On November 17, 2017, the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service issued a report discussing how new European Union (EU) organic regulations may affect the U.S. organic sector.  According to the report, though initial projects promised extensive reforms, the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service foresees only minor changes.  The report stated that “[t]he biggest likely impact for the United States organic sector is that the EU will require trade agreements in place of the current framework, equivalence arrangements.”  

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices
State Conservation Commission

AgLaw HotLinks:

Listen to our new Agricultural Law Podcast by clicking here!

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—July 28, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Food Security: President Signs Global Food Security Act
On July 20, 2016, President Obama signed into law S.1252, the Global Food Security Act of 2016, which “requires the President to develop and implement a Global Food Security Strategy to promote global food security, resilience, and nutrition.” According to the enacted legislation, the President is required to submit the strategy to Congress by October 1, 2016.

Checkoff Programs: USDA Issues Proposed Changes to Soybean and Beef Programs
On July 15, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published notice in the Federal Register of a proposed rule that would amend both the soybean and beef checkoff programs so as to allow producers “to request, under certain circumstances, that their assessments paid to a State board or council authorized under their respective statutes, be redirected to the national program” (81 FR 45984).  The comment period for the proposed rule ends September 13, 2016.

GMOs: EU Commission Announces Approval of Three Biotech Soybeans
On July 22, 2016, the European Commission issued a press release announcing the approval of three varieties of genetically modified soybeans (soybean MON 87708 x MON 89788, soybean MON 87705 x MON 89788 and soybean FG 72) for both food and feed uses in the European Union.  The European Commission did state, however, that the decision to approve the genetically soybeans does not extend to cultivation.

Food Safety: UK Reports Measures Improve Egg Safety
On July 25, 2016, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) of the United Kingdom Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF) issued a report regarding the “microbiological risk from shell eggs and their products’.” According to the report, since 2001, microbiological risk from Salmonella in UK hen shell eggs has been significantly reduced due to the “Lion Code quality assurance scheme, which comprises a suite of measures including: vaccination for Salmonella Enteritidis and Typhimurium, a cool chain from farm to retail outlets, enhanced testing for Salmonella, improved farm hygiene, effective rodent control, independent auditing, date stamping on each individual egg and traceability.” As a result, the report stated that UK shell eggs produced under the Lion Code may safely be consumed raw by “vulnerable groups” such as pregnant women, the young, and the elderly.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—July 20, 2016


Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

PA Tax Code: Governor Signs Tax Legislation Favorable to Agriculture
On July 13, 2016, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed into a law Act 84 which amended the Pennsylvania Tax Reform Code of 1971 and included three changes favorable to agriculture.  First, the sale and transfer of agricultural conservation easements are now exempt from Pennsylvania realty transfer taxes.  Second, the legislation provides for an inheritance tax exemption for family farm businesses where the transfer of assets involves a corporation or trust.  Third, the legislation provides for a tax exemption for commercial timbering operations.

Industrial Hemp: PA Governor Approves Growth and Cultivation
On July 20, 2016, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed Act 92 which permits the growth and cultivation of industrial hemp for research purposes in Pennsylvania.  According to Bill's cosponsors, Reps. Russ Diamond (R- Lebanon County) and Marty Flynn (D- Lackawanna County), industrial hemp can provide “fibers for textiles,…[and be] used to manufacture biodegradable plastics, building materials, food, paper, environmental, and energy products.” The representatives stated that “[c]ompanies overseas are switching out potentially dangerous fiberglass insulation with hemp insulation…[and that] [f]armers are cultivating the plant in between growing seasons as a cover crop for its ability to keep valuable nutrients in the soil.”

Clean and Green: Use Value Changes become Law
On July 20, 2016, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed Act 89 which amends the Pennsylvania Farmland and Forest Land Assessment Act of 1974 (Clean and Green) providing preferential tax assessment of agricultural and farmland.  The new legislation prohibits the application of use values that result in assessments higher than fair market value.  

Pesticides: EPA Publishes Notice Regarding Certain Pesticides
On July 15, 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a notice in the Federal Register entitled: Amendments to Terminate Uses for Certain Pesticide Registrations (81 FR 46075).  According to the Federal Register, the “notice announces EPA's final order for the amendments to terminate uses, voluntarily requested by the registrants and accepted by the Agency, [for certain pesticides] pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).” The cancellations under the order became effective July 15, 2016.

Proposed Rule: Importation of Sheep and Goats
On July 18, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) published notice in the Federal Register of a proposed rule “to amend the regulations that govern the importation of animals and animal products to revise the conditions for the importation of live sheep, goats, and certain other non-bovine ruminants, and products derived from sheep and goats, with regard to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and scrapie” (81 FR 46619).  The comment period for the proposed rule closes September 16, 2016.

Final Rule: Non-Ambulatory Disabled Veal Calves
On July 18, 2016, USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) published notice in the Federal Register of a final rule amending the agency’s requirements for the disposition of non-ambulatory disabled veal calves (81 FR 46570).  According to FSIS, the amendments remove a provision in the regulations requiring that ante-mortem inspection to be conducted in pens.  FSIS stated that the “final rule makes clear that FSIS inspectors have the authority to conduct ante-mortem inspection and condemn non-ambulatory disabled veal calves the moment they arrive on the premises of the establishment.”

European Union: EU Commission Announces €500 million Support Package for Farmers
On July 18, 2016, the European Union (EU) Commission issued a press release “present[ing] a new package of measures worth €500 million from EU funds to support farmers in the face of ongoing market difficulties, particularly on the dairy market.”  According to the press release, the package contained three main elements: (1) a scheme to provide incentives to reduce milk production; (2) conditional adjustment aid that will allow Member States to receive matching funds; and (3) technical measures to provide flexibility, cash-flow relief, and safety net resources.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—March 17, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

International Trade: Peru Agrees to Reduced Restrictions on U.S. Beef
On March 14, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a press release announcing that Peru has agreed to reduce restrictions on the importation of U.S. beef and beef products.  According USDA, previously, Peru had only accepted the importation of U.S. beef and beef products from U.S. “establishments that participated in the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Export Verification (EV) programs.” Now, however, Peru will accept for importation “beef and beef products from all federally inspected U.S. establishments.” According to USDA, the announced agreement reflects a 2013 decision by the World Organization for Animal Health’s (OIE) to upgrade the U.S.’ bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) risk classification from “controlled BSE risk” to “negligible BSE risk.” For more information, see previous blog post.

GMO Labeling: Senate Votes against Ending Debate on GMO Labeling Bill
On March 16, 2016, the U.S. Senate voted 48-49 against a motion to invoke cloture on Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts’ proposed amendment that would create a “national voluntary bioengineered food labeling standard” (S.2609).  An attempt to end debate and advance the legislation to a vote, the motion fell short of the 60 votes required under Senate Rule 22 (“the cloture rule’).  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), a supporter of the proposed amendment, voted against the motion, and as a result, retains the ability to bring the bill back for a vote in the event a later agreement is reached.

GMO Labeling: Washington Judge Rules GMA Knew of Plan to Conceal Funds to Influence Ballot Initiative
On March 9, 2016, the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Thurston County held that the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) members knew of a plan by GMA to conceal funding efforts made to defeat the passage of Washington’s 2013 ballot Initiative 522; a proposal designed to “require the labeling on all packaged food products that contained Growth Modified Organisms (GMOs)” State of Washington v. Grocery Manufacturers Association (Case No. 13-2-02156-8).  The court held that as a matter of law, GMA’s actions violated the public finance provisions of Washington’s public disclosure law RCW 42.17A, but, in regards to assessing penalties, a question of fact still remained as to whether GMA’s violations were intentional.

Clean and Green: Agricultural and Rural Affairs Committee Votes to Amend Application of Use Values
On March 15, 2016, the Pennsylvania State Senate Agricultural and Rural Affairs committee voted unanimously to report House Bill 806 (H.B. 806) out of committee. The legislation, intended to amend the Pennsylvania Farmland and Forest Land Assessment Act of 1974 (commonly known as Clean and Green) so as “to prohibit the application of use values that result in assessments higher than fair market value,” now moves to the full senate for first consideration

SCOTUS: Court Rejects Request by Deere to Stay New Hampshire Equipment Dealer Law
On March 4, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied a request by Deere & Company, et al. (Deere) to recall and stay a lower court ruling pending the filing of a writ for certiorari (Docket No. 15A910).  As a result, Deere must abide by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire’s ruling upholding the New Hampshire Vehicle Franchise Act (known as the “dealer bill of rights”) regulating equipment dealer contracts regarding such matters as termination of dealer agreements, warranty obligations, and business transfer rights (Deere & Company v. State, 2015 WL 9467010). 

Menu Labeling: FDA Delays Menu Labeling Enforcement
On March 9, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement announcing that FDA would be delaying enforcement of the Menu Labeling Final Rule until “one year after it issues final, Level 1 guidance on menu labeling.” FDA is currently considering comments, and has not set a time for when it will issue final, Level 1 guidance on menu labeling.  Previously, FDA menu labeling enforcement was scheduled to begin December 1, 2016. 

EU: European Commission Announces Support for Struggling Farmers
On March 14, 2016, the European Commission issued a press release announcing a “package of exceptional measures” designed to support struggling European Union farmers in the “dairy, pigmeat, and fruit and vegetable sectors.” According to the Commission, the measures are an acknowledgement “of the current agricultural crisis” and will be in addition to the €500 million agricultural support package announced by the Commission in September 2015.  

Thursday, November 5, 2015

EU Parliament Rejects National Bans on GM Feed

Written by Tyler R. Etter

The European Parliament has rejected a plan by the European Commission that would allow member 
states to ban genetically modified (GM) food or feed on their territories. The rejection was held by 577 
votes to 77, with 38 abstentions. 

Three feed organizations, COCERAL, FEDIOL and FEFAC, said they were relieved at the outcome. The 
organizations conducted an assessment of the impact of switching from GM to non-GM soy, finding that 
such a switch would result in an increase of costs around 10%. According to the report, the resulting 
costs across the EU would consist of 2.8 billion euros. Following the proposal would impair the 
competitiveness of the industry, both domestically and in the import sector.

Giovanni La Via, the leader of the vote, mentioned the concerns about the proposal’s integration with 
the EU’s single market goal, and the overall feasibility, noting that “there was no evaluation of the 
potential consequences or of other available options.” The Commission suggested that the proposal 
should be modeled after the EU law for GMOs intended for cultivation, but the difficulties adapting a 
similar approach for a trade oriented issues will have to be evaluated. 



Thursday, October 29, 2015

European Commission to Rule on GM Status of New Breeding Techniques

Written by Tyler R. Etter

On October 22, 2015, the European Commission held a discussion on new techniques of crop breeding
that do not utilize the genes of different species unlike current genetic modification (GM). The delegates
agreed that clarification is needed on the legal framework of these techniques. Proponents aim for the
techniques to fall outside of GM classification, to further encourage and facilitate agricultural research
and innovation in Europe.

The discussed techniques included cisgenesis, intragenesis, and grafting. Cisgenesis has been deemed to
be closer to conventional breeding by the European Food Safety Authority. However, the European
Union (EU) currently holds the technique under the scope of existing legislation on GM.

The German delegation raised concerns about the potential effects of the interpretation of the EU GM
laws, spanning across concerns for research, development and production of medicines and vaccines,
competitive ability, the adoption of new techniques, and trade. Germany highlighted the potential need
for new systems to detect such modifications, and the need for health assessments on the safety of the
created products.

In response, Health and Consumers Commissioner Vytenis Andriukatis stated that an assessment is
underway, and is anticipated to conclude by the end of 2015.