Showing posts with label Environmental. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environmental. Show all posts

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—August 11, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

GMO Labeling: Vermont to No Longer Enforce State Labeling Law
On August 2, 2016, Vermont Attorney General William H. Sorrell announced that due to the July 29, 2016 federal enactment of the “National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard,” Vermont would no longer enforce Act 120 which required “the labeling of food produced with genetic engineering.” Act 120 became effective in Vermont on July 1, 2016.

Right to Farm: Oklahoma Supreme Court Allows Constitutional Amendment to Appear on Ballot
On August 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held that Legislative Referendum No. 368 (LF 368) could be included on the November 2016 ballot (Save the Illinois River, Inc. v. State of Oklahoma, 2016 WL 4189500).  If approved by the voters, LF 368 would amend the Oklahoma constitution to prohibit the state “Legislature from passing any law ‘which abridges the right of citizens and lawful residents of Oklahoma to employ agricultural technology and livestock production and ranching practices without a compelling state interest.’” As a result of the Court’s decision, LF 368 is scheduled to appear on the November 2016 ballot as State Question No. 777.

Labor: DOL and PA Dept. of Labor and Industry Sign Agreement to Combat Employee Misclassification    
On August 4, 2016, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) issued a press release stating that DOL and the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry have signed a three year agreement designed to “to protect employees’ rights by preventing their misclassification as independent contractors or other non-employee statuses.” According to the press release, “[t]he two agencies will provide clear, accurate and easy-to-access outreach to employers, employees and other stakeholders; share resources; and enhance enforcement by conducting coordinated investigations and sharing information consistent with applicable law.”

Environmental Litigation: EPA and Pennsylvania Announce Settlement with Consol Regarding Wastewater Contamination
On August 4, 2016, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a press release stating that the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have reached an agreement with Consol Energy Inc., CNX Coal Resources and Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co. LLC (Consol) requiring that Consol implement practices that prevent the contaminated discharges of mining wastewater in Pennsylvania.  According to DOJ, under the terms of the agreement, Consol will “complete and maintain certain water management measures to prevent discharges from certain outfalls at the [company’s Bailey Mine Complex in Greene and Washington Counties]; monitor and report quarterly and annually, to ensure adequate storage capacity to prevent future discharges; submit and implement a plan for achieving long term compliance through advanced treatment in the event of projected exhaustion of storage capacity; develop and implement an environmental management system to ensure environmental compliance throughout the [Bailey Mine] Complex; and, pay a $3 million civil penalty.”

Invasive Species: PDA Announces Expanded Spotted Lanternfly Quarantine  
On August 5, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) issued a press release stating that “Pennsylvania’s Spotted Lanternfly quarantine has been expanded to Maxatawny Township and Kutztown Borough in Berks County and Upper Milford Township and Emmaus Borough in Lehigh County after small populations of the invasive species were found in those areas.” According to PDA, “[t]he general quarantine of these infested areas restricts movement of any material or object that can spread the pest…[such as] firewood or wood products, brush or yard waste, remodeling or construction materials and waste, packing material like boxes, grapevines for decorative purposes or as nursery stock, and any outdoor household articles like lawnmowers, grills, tarps and other equipment, trucks or vehicles typically not stored indoors.”

Pesticides: EPA Announces Availability of Draft Pesticide Registration Notices
On August 5, 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published notice in the Federal Register of the availability of two draft Pesticide Registration Notices “for review and comment: One entitled ‘Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on Pesticide Resistance Management Labeling’ and the other entitled ‘Guidance for Herbicide Resistance Management Labeling, Education, Training, and Stewardship’” (81 FR 51880).  Additionally, according to EPA, the comment period for both notices has been extended from August 2, 2016 to September 1, 2016.

Animal Welfare: USDA Proposes Amendment to Animal Welfare Act to Empower Secretary of Agriculture
On August 4, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) published notice in the Federal Register that the department was issuing a proposed rule to amend the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (81 FR 51386).  According to USDA APHIS, the proposed rule would amend AWA to provide “the Secretary of Agriculture with the authority to determine that animal dealers and exhibitors are not required to obtain a license under the Act and regulations if the size of the business conducting AWA-related activities is determined to be de minimis by the Secretary.” The comment period for the proposed rule closes November 2, 2016.

Food Standards: USDA Announces New Standards for Grades of Fruits and Vegetables
On August 4, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published a final notice in the Federal Register regarding revisions to “41 U.S. Standards for Grades of fresh fruits and vegetables, fruits and vegetables for processing, nuts, and specialty crops by removing the ‘Unclassified’ category from each standard” (81 FR 51297).  The effective date for the revised standards is September 6, 2016.

Organic Regulations: USDA Removes Program to Assess Organic Certifying Agencies
On August 8, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published notice in the Federal Register of a direct final rule removing the “Program to Assess Organic Certifying Agencies” from 7 CFR Part 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations (81FR 52589).  The comment period on the direct final rule closes on September 8, 2016 and becomes effective November 7, 2016.

Livestock Reporting: Reauthorization and Revisions to Livestock Mandatory Reporting
On August 11, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published notice in the Federal Register of a final rule regarding the reauthorization of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting program (81 FR 52969).  Additionally, the “final rule incorporates the swine reporting revisions contained within the 2015 Reauthorization Act and a minor revision to the lamb reporting requirements under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, USDA Livestock Mandatory Reporting regulations.” The final rule becomes effective October 11, 2016.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Following Ninth Circuit Decision, EPA Orders Ban On Sulfoxaflor Sales

Written by Katharine Richter

On September 10, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided in favor of various “commercial bee keepers and bee keeping organizations” who challenged the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval of “insecticides containing sulfoxaflor, which initial studies showed were highly toxic to honey bees.”  As a result of the decision, the EPA issued a cancellation order on November 12, 2015, for “all previously registered Sulfoxaflor products.”  As part of the order, “all distribution or sale by the registrant of cancelled sulfoxaflor products is prohibited, unless such distribution or sale is for the purpose of disposal or export.”

In the opinion, the Ninth Circuit Court begins by discussing the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which “prohibits the use or sale of pesticides that lack approval and registration by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),” 7 U.S.C. § 136a(a).  FIFRA uses a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether a pesticide will cause unreasonable risk to people or the environment.  After a new pesticide has been submitted to the EPA for approval, the EPA can either conditionally or unconditionally accept.  Unconditional acceptance would require sufficient data to show there are no unreasonable risks associated with the pesticide.  Conditional acceptance would require more data submitted after a period of use of the pesticide. 

In this case, Dow Agrosciences LLC (DOW) applied for approval of three pesticides, all containing sulfoxaflor as the main ingredient.  In January 2013, the EPA announced it would conditionally register the sulfoxaflor, but “less than seven months later, on May 6, the EPA decided to “unconditionally” register sulfoxaflor.”  This occurred even though DOW “never completed the requested additional studies” and “the EPA acknowledged the insufficiency of the data to support unconditioned registration.” 


The Ninth Circuit Court vacated the EPA’s “unconditional registration of sulfoxaflor, and remanded for the EPA to obtain further studies and data regarding the effects of sulfoxaflor on bees, as required by EPA regulations.”

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Chesapeake Bay Update: Environmental Group Calls for Moratorium on New Eastern Shore Poultry Operations

Written by Tyler R. Etter

On September 8, 2015, the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) released a new report detailing the
expansion of poultry operations on the Eastern Shore, despite cutbacks to water quality monitoring
made by Maryland. As a result, EIP and its allies are calling for a moratorium on new poultry operations
until at least 2024, concerned with rising phosphorous levels in the Chesapeake Bay.

Of concern to the environmental groups is that of the 16 monitoring stations near the Eastern Shore
rivers only 7 are now operating following the state officials shutting down 9 of the stations two years
ago. The groups call attention to the damage caused to the ecosystem by the “high concentration of
poultry waste” on the Shore. They are also concerned about citizen exposure to antibiotic resistant
bacteria present in the waste. The groups chose 2024 for the moratorium period, as that is the year that
Maryland’s Phosphorous Management Tool will be fully implemented, broadening the protections to
the area.

Julie Oberg, spokeswoman for Maryland’s Department of Agriculture, stated that regulations have
effectively barred the use of manure of soils with high nutrient content, and any regulations apply to
new and old operations alike when concerned with water quality. The executive director of the
Maryland Farm Bureau, Valerie T. Connelly, called the moratorium “ridiculous” without targeting other
sources of pollution.

The executive director of Delmarva Poultry Industry Inc. stated that the expansion in operations is a
response to recent economic hardship and regulatory barriers. He claims the industry is just now
“catching up” from the setbacks, and the new operations will have the latest technology to protect the
environment.

Monday, August 6, 2012

The EPA removes the “propose to discharge” requirement for CAFOs

On July 19th, the EPA removed the “propose to discharge” requirement from the permitting process for Consolidated Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in response to National Pork Producers Council v. EPA. The revision eliminates the requirement that CAFOs must get approval from the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The new rule became effective on July, 30th.
Written by Joseph Negaard, Research Assistant
Penn State Law, Agricultural Law Center
August 6, 2012