Showing posts with label Antibiotic Use. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Antibiotic Use. Show all posts

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—May 30, 2019


Written by: M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
           
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Food Labeling: FDA Encourages 'Best If Used By' Date Labels
On May 23, 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a letter encouraging the food industry to reduce food waste through the use of “Best If Used By” product labels.  FDA stated that food manufacturers voluntarily use several phrases, such as “Best If Used By,” “Use By,” and “Sell By”, to indicate the date by which a product should be consumed for optimal quality.  According to FDA, such phrases are only used to note product quality and not product safety.  FDA asserted, however, that confusion over the different date labels has resulted in approximately 20% of consumer food waste.  Based on consumer research, FDA is encouraging the standardized use of the phrase “Best If Used By” to emphasize to consumers that after the marked date, the product may not be at optimal quality but that it is still safe to consume.    

Crop Insurance: USDA Announces Crop Insurance Benefits for Military Veterans
On May 22, 2019, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced new federal crop insurance coverage benefits available to eligible military veterans with farms or ranches.  According to USDA, to be eligible, a veteran must not have been dishonorably discharged and must “have actively operated and managed a farm or ranch with an insurable interest in any crop or livestock for five crop years or less or have been discharged from active duty during the most recent five crop years.” Created under the 2018 Farm Bill, the new crop insurance benefits for veterans provide:
  • An exemption from administrative fees for catastrophic and additional coverage policies;
  • An additional 10% premium subsidy for additional coverage policies with premium subsidies;
  • The ability to use another person’s production history for specific acreage transferred to a veteran who previously was involved in the crop production on that acreage; and
  • An increase in yield adjustment from 60 to 80% of the applicable transitional yield.  

International Trade: USDA Announces Support for Farmers Affected by Trade Dispute
On May 23, 2019, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced several actions to help U.S. farmers negatively affected by the U.S.’s ongoing trade dispute with China.  According to USDA, U.S. farmers have suffered financially due to Chinese tariffs and market distortions which have limited U.S. agricultural exports to China.  To help those U.S. farmers negatively affected, USDA announced $16 billion in assistance programs.  First, under the Market Facilitation Program, USDA’s Farm Service Agency will provide $14.5 billion in direct payments to qualifying producers.  Next, under the Food Purchase and Distribution Program, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service will purchase $1.4 billion of surplus commodities affected by trade retaliation.  Finally, under the Agricultural Trade Promotion Program, USDA’s Foreign Agriculture Service will issue $100 million to assist in developing new export markets.

Antibiotic Use: APHIS Releases Data on Beef and Swine Antimicrobial Use
On May 23, 2019, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced the results from research examining the use of antimicrobials at beef feedlots and large swine operations in 2016.  According to the data collected, 87.5% of the beef feedlots gave cattle antimicrobials in feed, water, or by injection.  Additionally, 95.5% of the swine operations gave market pigs antimicrobials in feed, water, or by injection.  According to APHIS, the main reason antimicrobials were used at both feedlots and swine operations was to prevent, control, or treat disease.  APHIS did note that the results did not account for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s January 2017 rule change preventing antimicrobials used for human health from being utilized to promote growth in food-producing animals.

Checkoff Programs: USDA Announces National Pork Board Appointments
On May 28, 2019, The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the appointment of five new members to the National Pork Board.  The appointed members are: Russell A. Nugent III, Lowell, Ark.; Gene Noem, Ames, Iowa; Bill Luckey, Columbus, Neb.; Alicia Pedemonti, Hopkinton, N.H.; and Michael P. Skahill, Williamsburg, Va.  The National Pork Board consists of 15 members appointed for three-year terms by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture.  Board members are responsible for the collection, distribution and program accountability of the Pork Checkoff.  Under the current Pork Checkoff program U.S. pork producers and importers pay $0.40 per $100 of value when pigs are sold in the U.S. and when pigs, pork, or pork products are imported into the U.S.

From National Ag Law Experts:
“USDA Announces 2019 Market Facilitation Program”, Kristine A. Tidgren, The Ag Docket – Iowa State University Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation (May 24, 2019)  
“Crop Insurance Arbitration: Navigating the Landmines”, Kenneth D. Ackerman, Elliot Belilos, AG/FDA Blog, Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC (May 15, 2019)  
    
Federal Actions and Notices:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Pennsylvania Legislation:
SB 665: Legislation requiring that all dogs or cats adopted from an animal shelter be spayed/neutered by a veterinarian prior to release from the shelter (Referred to Senate Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee, May 24, 2019)
HB 1504: Legislation providing for compensation and for applications for dog licenses, fees and penalties (Referred to House Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee, May 23, 2019)

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Agriculture

Independent Regulatory Review Commission
“Notice of filing of final rulemakings” (Department of Agriculture Milk Sanitation)

State Conservation Commission

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:

Penn State Research:

AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter    
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food

Thursday, December 20, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—December 20, 2018


Written by:
M. Sean High (Staff Attorney) and Deanna Smith (Research Assistant)
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Publication Note: The Agricultural Law Weekly Review will not be published during the holiday week of December 24-28.  The next scheduled publication date will be January 3, 2019.

Right to Farm Laws: Judge Denies Punitive Damages in Latest Hog Farm Nuisance Lawsuit
On December 13, 2018, The News & Observer reported that a federal district judge has denied punitive damages sought against hog producer Murphy-Brown, LLC regarding nuisance litigation in North Carolina.  This lawsuit centers around Sholar Farms, a swine operation in Sampson County, North Carolina, and eight neighbors who alleged that the operation created a nuisance due to foul odors and excessive noise.  The jury found in favor of the plaintiff’s and awarded between $100 and $75,000 in compensation for the harm of living near the hog farm.  While the plaintiff’s counsel further argued for punitive damages, presiding judge David Faber determined there was not enough evidence in this case to pursue the additional damages.

National Agricultural Policy: USDA’s New Program for High Speed Internet in Rural America
On Thursday, December 13, 2018, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is offering internet service providers, telecommunications companies, municipalities, rural electric cooperatives and utilities, up to $600 million in loans and grants to help build high speed broadband infrastructure throughout rural America.  Secretary Perdue stated that “high speed internet e-Connectivity is a necessity, not an amenity, vital for the quality of life and economic opportunity.” Approximately $200M of the funds will be allocated for grants, $200M for loan and grant combinations, and $200M for low-interest loans.  For more information on application deadlines see page 64315 of the December 14, 2018 Federal Register.  This funding can be applied for through the USDA’s new ReConnect Program and is administered primarily under the USDA’s Rural Development Agency.

Water Quality: Ohio Legislative Committee Rejects Revisions to State’s Watershed Rule
On December 10, 2018, an Ohio legislative committee voted to send watershed rule revisions back to the state’s department of agriculture for further consideration.  Known as the “watersheds in distress” rules, the revisions are an attempt by the Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) to deal with issues related to nutrient management and water quality.  The legislative committee, called the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, determined by a vote of 8 – 1 that ODA should revise and refile the rules for when the committee next meets on January 22, 2019.  For a more in-depth analysis of the ruling, please see Peggy Kirk Hall’s recent article entitled: “’Watersheds in distress’ rules don’t clear the JCARR hurdle”

International Trade: USDA Announces Second Round of Trade Mitigation Payments for Farmers
On December 17, 2018, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced a second round of trade mitigation payments for farmers adversely affected by trade retaliation by foreign nations.  Accordingly, farmers that produce almonds, cotton, corn, milk, hogs, soybeans, sorghum, fresh sweet cherries, and wheat will now be eligible to receive Market Facilitation Program payments for the second half of their 2018 production.  According to USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue, payments are intended to help affected producers deal with short-term cash flow issues.  Interested producers can receive more information at their local USDA Farm Service Agency office or visit www.farmers.gov.

Antibiotic Use: McDonald’s Announces New Antibiotic Policy for Beef
On December 11, 2018, McDonald’s announced a new policy intended to reduce antibiotics in the beef supplied to the food company.  According to McDonald’s, antibiotic resistance poses a recognized threat to global health, food security, and development.  As a result, the company hopes to cause a reduction in the use of antibiotics in beef production through:

  • Partnering with producers that supply beef in the company’s top 10 beef sourcing markets to measure and understand current antibiotic usage;
  • By the end of 2020, establishing targets to reduce medically important antibiotics in the company’s top 10 beef sourcing markets; and
  • Beginning in 2022, reporting progress made in reducing antibiotic usage in the company’s top 10 beef sourcing markets.

From National Ag Law Experts:
“2018 Ag Law Year in Review”,  Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, Texas Agricultural Law Blog (December 17, 2018)
“Congress Sends 2018 Farm Bill to President”, Kristine A. Tidgren, The Ag Docket – Iowa State University Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation (December 15, 2018)
“Ohio Agricultural Law Blog--We bring you tidings of gifts and tax implications in this season of giving”, Evin Bachelor, Ag Law Blog – Agricultural Law & Taxation – Ohio State University Extension (December 7, 2018)  

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Environmental Protection

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:

Penn State Research:

AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food

Thursday, November 1, 2018

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—November 1, 2018


Written by:
M. Sean High—Staff Attorney
Deanna Smith—Research Assistant
                 
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Technology: 75.3 Lbs. Drone Approved for Precision Agriculture
On October 25, 2018, sUAS News reported that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved a petition by Homeland Surveillance & Electronics, LLC (HSE) to operate a 75.3 lbs. unmanned aircraft system (UAS) for use in precision agriculture.  Under FAA regulations, UASs must weigh less than 55 lbs. at takeoff (14 CFR 107.3).  HSE, however, successfully received permission from FAA to commercially operate the 75.3 lbs. UAS model AG-V6A+ for use in precision commercial agriculture services including: crop and moisture analysis; spraying herbicides, pesticides and insecticides; aerial imagery; and 3D modeling.

Land Use: PA Governor Signs Bill Expanding Liability Protection for Recreational Land Use
On October 24, 2018, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed into law legislation amending the state’s recreational use of land liability law (Act 98).  Under the commonwealth’s Recreational Use of Land and Water Act (RULWA), landowners who at no charge open their land for public recreational use are granted limits to their legal liability (68 P.S. §477-1 et seq.).  Under the new legislation, RULWA’s definition of “land” is expanded to provide coverage to areas including boating access and launch ramps, bridges, fishing piers, boat docks, ramps, paths, paved or unpaved trails, and hunting blinds.  Additionally, the definition of “land” is expanded to include parking and access to land areas provided coverage.  The new law also expands RULWA’s definition of “recreational purpose” to allow for coverage of activities such as snowmobiling, all-terrain vehicle riding, and motorcycle riding.  Finally, the new legislation further defines what types of contributions to the landowner are not considered to constitute a “charge.”      

Education: PA Governor Vetoes Ag Education Bill
On October 24, 2018, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf vetoed proposed legislation addressing agricultural education in the commonwealth (HB 2157).  Governor Wolf stated that the proposed legislation would have rendered “certain agricultural education programs ineligible for state and federal funding…[because] the Pennsylvania Department of Education is the single state agency that is federally authorized to approve these programs.” According to the Governor, in 2017 his administration “distributed approximately $57,000,000 in state Career and Technical Education funding to schools across the commonwealth.” He stated that if enacted, HB 2157 would have removed program approval authority from the department; thereby impairing the ability of those schools to receive such funds in the future.  Governor Wolf further asserted that the legislation would have eliminated “funding for agricultural education programs approved under this bill’s provisions.” Finally, the Governor stated that under the legislation, schools that currently receive Federal Perkins funding for Agriculture Education programs would have been required “to forego such funds, costing those schools $6,345,299.” Prior to the Governor’s veto, HB 2157 passed in the House by a vote of 192-0 and in the Senate by a vote of 46-3.

Food Safety: FDA and USDA Hold Public Meeting on Cell Culture Technology Regulation
On October 23 and 24, 2018, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a two-day joint public meeting titled, “The Use of Cell Culture Technology to Develop Products Derived from Livestock and Poultry.” On September 10, 2018, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, announced the joint public meeting regarding the two agencies teaming up to regulate cell cultured meat.  Gottlieb stated that “advances in animal cell cultured food products present many important and timely technical and regulatory considerations for [both] the FDA” and the USDA.   Accordingly, the joint-meeting’s agenda included discussions on the current regulatory frameworks of the USDA and FDA involving foods and products of cell culture technology.  The meeting also addressed the potential hazards of cell cultured meats and appropriate regulatory oversights.  Recordings of the two-day meeting are available online through the FSIS website.  Comments on this issue are due by November 26, 2018.

Antibiotic Use: EU Restricts Antibiotic Use in Farm Animals
On October 26, 2018, the Guardian reported that the European Union (EU) parliament has approved restrictions regarding the use of antibiotics on healthy farm animals.  According to the report, the restrictions are an attempt to prevent antibiotic resistant bacteria commonly referred to as “superbugs.” The Guardian stated that EU farmers have routinely used antibiotics on healthy farm animals as a way to prevent the potential spread of disease.  Scientist, however, assert that this common practice has increased antimicrobial-resistance and could result in antibiotics no longer being an effective source of medical treatment.  The new restrictions are scheduled to go into effect by 2022.

From National Ag Law Experts:
“Death of Ranch Hand Raises Important Legal Issues”, Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, Texas Agricultural Law Blog, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension (October 28, 2018)
“Long-Term Leases Provide a Valuable Succession Planning Tool as Recent Court Case Highlights”, Paul Goeringer, Maryland Risk Management Education Blog (October 30, 2018)

Pennsylvania Legislation:
Act 162 (SB 1171): Nutrient management and odor management legislation addressing the Nutrient Management Advisory Board and the Agricultural Advisory Board (Signed by the Governor, October 24, 2018)

Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
Department of Agriculture: Rules and Regulations

State Conservation Commission: Notices

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture

Penn State Research:

AgLaw HotLinks:

Stay Informed:
Listen to our weekly Agricultural Law Podcast
Read our monthly Agricultural Law Brief newsletter     
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive daily AgLaw HotLinks
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Agriculture Law Weekly Review – June 29, 2017

Written by Deanna Smith – Research Assistant

COOL: Cattlemen Sue Over Removal of County of Origin Labeling Requirements

On June 19, 2017, Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America, and Cattle Producers of Washington filed a complaint in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of Washington against USDA. The lawsuit alleges that USDA’s revocation of the Country of Origin Labeling requirement upon imported meat is a violation of the statutory text in the Meat Inspection Act which mandates that all imported meat intended for human consumption be “labeled as required by such regulations for imported articles.” 21 U.S.C. § 620(a). This refers back to the Tariff Act of 1930, which states “every article of foreign origin … shall be marked … in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States … the country of origin of the article” 19 U.S.C. § 1304(a). For more information regarding the lawsuit, please see this article in Food Safety News, and for those who have access to PACER, you can view the complaint here.

Local Food: Maine Governor Paul LePage Signs Food Sovereignty Law

On June 16, 2017, Maine Governor Paul LePage signed LB 725, which allows municipalities to regulate local food systems and the “transport of water for commercial purposes beyond … the municipality” through local ordinances. The bill enables Maine municipalities to regulate their own food systems without state licensing and inspection requirements for food grown, sold, and consumed locally. Local municipalities still must adhere to state and federal regulations and the bill does not apply to food grown for distribution outside the municipality. For additional insight into Maine’s new food sovereignty law, see this article in Food Safety News.

Beef Grading: USDA Proposes Additional Standards of Grading for Beef Quality

On June 19, 2017, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published proposed amendments to the United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. The new standards would require “dentition and documentation of actual age” in order to better classify maturity of carcasses during quality grading. Skeletal and muscular evidence are the only evidence currently used to determine meat palatability which in turn helps dictates the value of beef. This new requirement would enable USDA to look at more aspects of cattle and beef during official quality grading. For further reading on the proposed standard, see this article in Delta Farm Press.

National Ag Policy: The American Heart Association Issues “Presidential Advisory” on Dietary Fats and Cardiovascular Disease

In their June 20, 2017, edition of Circulation, the American Heart Association (AHA) issued a presidential advisory reviewing the scientific evidence on the effects of dietary saturated fat intake on cardiovascular disease (CVD). The advisory included the results of recent studies conducted on the effects dietary saturated fats have on CVD compared to the effects that potential substitutes have on CVD. Overall, AHA recommends lowering the intake of saturated fats by replacing them with unsaturated fats, especially polyunsaturated fats, in order to lower the prevalence of CVD. For more information regarding AHA’s presidential advisory, see this article in Food Safety News.

Antibiotic Use: Sanderson Farms Sued for Natural Label Claim

Organic Consumers Association, Friends of the Earth, and Center for the Food Safety filed a complaint June 22, 2017, against Sanderson Farms, Inc., alleging that the company falsely and misleadingly advertised its chicken products as “100% Natural.” The complaint claims that “residues of antibiotics important for human medicine, residues of veterinary antibiotics, and other pharmaceuticals, as well as residues of hormones, steroids, and pesticides” were found in inspections of Sanderson Farms’ chicken. Sanderson Farms reportedly supplies chicken to companies such as Walmart, Weis, Dairy Queen, and Chili’s. For additional information, including a statement from Sanderson Farms Chief Financial Officer Mike Cockrell, see this article in Meatingplace.

GMOs: Kansas Farmers Awarded Over $217 Million in Syngenta Class Action Suit

On June 23, 2017, a federal jury found in favor of Kansas corn farmers awarding over $217,700,000 to 7,000 farmers. The class action lawsuit was filed in January of 2016 against Syngenta for introducing new genetic traits into the U.S. corn market before the GMO varieties had been approved by all major export markets. The complaint alleged that these traits, commercially advertised as Viptera and Duracade, were then found in imports to China before being approved. This resulted in the inability of U.S. corn farmers to export corn into China. Feedstuffs reported that this class action lawsuit was one of eight brought by corn farmers throughout the U.S. and the first one to go to trial. At the conclusion of the trial, a Syngenta spokesperson announced, “[t]he case is without merit, and we will move forward with an appeal and continue to defend the rights of American farmers to access safe and effective, U.S-approved technologies.”

International: European Court of Justices Upholds Dairy Labeling Standards

On June 14, 2017, the European Court of Justice ruled that plant-based dairy alternatives cannot be labeled with terms such as “milk,” “cream,” “butter”, “cheese,” or “yogurt.” This ruling comes in response to Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb (VSW) filing a lawsuit against TofuTown, a German vegetarian and vegan food producer with products such as “Soyatoo Tofu butter,” and “Plant cheese.” The lawsuit alleged that the use of such terms violated Article 78 of Regulation No 1308/2013 of the European Union titled “Definitions, designations and sales descriptions for certain sectors and products.” This decision has been lauded by the National Milk Producers Federation as can be seen in their June 23 press release. For more information about this court decision, please see the following article in Just-Food.

WOTUS: EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Propose Rescission of Clean Water Rule

In a press release issued on Tuesday, June 27, 2017, the U.S. Army and EPA announced a proposal to withdraw the Clean Water Rule and to “re-codify the regulatory text that existed prior to 2015 defining ‘waters of the United States.’” The proposed rule would codify the identical regulatory text that was in place prior to the 2015 Clean Water Rule, effectively negating the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s decision to stay the 2015 rule. Following this action, the agencies intend to conduct an extensive re-evaluation of the definition of waters of the U.S. in accordance with President Trump’s Presidential Executive Order on “Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.” For more information, please see the pre-publication version of the proposed rule.


Pennsylvania Legislation

Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Senate)
  •      HB944: An Act amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, in terms and courses of study, further providing for agricultural education and providing for Commission for Agricultural Education Excellence. (Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS, June 23, 2017)
  •      HB1494: An Act amending the act of June 28, 1995 (P.L.89, No.18), known as the Conservation and Natural Resources Act, in Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, further providing for contracts and agreements.( Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS, June 23, 2017)

Environmental Resources and Energy (House)
  •      HB1341: An Act amending the act of July 7, 2008 (P.L.654, No.55), known as the Bituminous Coal Mine Safety Act, in emergency medical personnel, further providing for definitions, for emergency medical personnel, for regulations, for continuing training, for certification and for liability. (Final passage, June 26, 2017)
  •      HB1333: An Act amending the act of May 31, 1945 (P.L.1198, No.418), known as the Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act, further providing for mining permit, reclamation plan and bond. (Final passage, June 26, 2017)
  •      SB639: An Act amending the act of March 1, 1988 (P.L.82, No.16), known as the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Act, further providing for definitions; and providing for additional use of funds for financial assistance. (Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY, June 27, 2017)
  •      HB1624: An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, providing for education reinvestment severance tax, for minimum royalty for unconventional oil or gas well products and for remedy for failure to pay the minimum royalty on unconventional oil or gas wells; and making a related repeal. (Referred to ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY, June 26, 2017)


HotLinks:


Follow us on Twitter at Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.


For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.