Showing posts with label ACRE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ACRE. Show all posts

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Agricultural Law Weekly Review - November 7, 2019

Written by:  
Brook Duer—Staff Attorney
Audry Thompson—Research Assistant
           
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Agricultural Finance:  Chapter 12 Farm Bankruptcies Increasing 
On October 30, 2019, American Farm Bureau (AFB) released a market intelligence report authored by Chief Economist John Newton showing that Chapter 12 farm bankruptcy filings rose 24% in the 12-month period ending September 2019 as compared to the same period one year earlier.  There were a total of 580 Chapter 12 filings, which nevertheless remains lower than the recent high of 676 filings in 2011.  Individual state and regional filings varied greatly but nine states recorded totals at or above 10-year highs (Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Wisconsin and West Virginia).  More than 40% of the filings, 255, were in a 13-state region of the Midwest.  That compares to 78 filed in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions combined.  The Southeast recorded the second-highest total with 118 filings, an increase in that region of 31%.  While Newton also reported record-high total farm income projections for 2019 of $88 billion, nearly 40% of that income or approximately $33 billion, is attributable to trade war aid, disaster assistance, farm bill programs and insurance indemnities.

Right to Farm Laws:  Pennsylvania Attorney General Releases 2019 ACRE Annual Report 
On October 25, 2019, the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General (OAG) released its annual report of case review and enforcement activity under Pennsylvania’s 2005 Agriculture, Communities and Rural Environment (ACRE) statute.  Under the ACRE statute, OAG has the authority, among other things, to review a local ordinance upon referral and determine if it  meets the statute’s definition of “unauthorized” due to infringement upon the conduct of a “normal agricultural operation’ as defined in Pennsylvania’s Right to Farm Law.  If so, OAG may seek injunctive relief against its enforcement.  In the state fiscal year from July 2018 to June 2019, OAG received nineteen (19) referrals of new cases, as compared to eight (8) the previous fiscal year, closed twelve (12) cases and continued working on fifteen (15) cases remaining from previous years.  Since the 2005 inception of the ACRE program, OAG reports 174 total referrals, 33 of which remain pending and 141 of which have been resolved. Of the 174 total referrals since 2005, 7 resulted in lawsuits being filed.  Frequently, cases are resolved through negotiation with township governments for ordinance amendments.  The report details the status of each lawsuit and what case law precedent has been established.  The report is not yet posted on OAG’s website but is available upon request at acre@attorneygeneral.gov

Conservation Programs:  NRCS Proposes Revisions to the National Handbook of Conservation Practices Mandated by the 2018 Farm Bill 
On October 23, 2019, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) published proposed revisions to the National Handbook of Conservation Practices (NHCP) regarding standards for planning, designing, installing, operating and maintaining an enumerated list of thirteen (13) conservation practices used in conservation systems that treat highly erodible land (HEL) or on land determined to be a wetland. There is a thirty (30) day public comment period which closes on November 22, 2019.  These revisions stem from a mandate contained in the 2018 Farm Bill for NRCS to review current conservation practice standards to increase flexibility, optimize site-specific needs and minimize risks of design failure.  The conservation practice standards proposed to be revised support programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Conservation Stewardship Program. Ultimately, those programs help producers cover part of the costs for implementing these practices. 

Food Policy:  USDA, EPA, and FDA Partner with the Food Waste Reduction Alliance
On October 30, 2019, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishing a formal collaboration with the Food Waste Reduction Alliance (FWRA).  The FWRA is an initiative between the Grocery Manufacturers Association, the Food Marketing Institute, and the National Restaurant Association that aims to reduce the creation of food waste, increase donations of food to those in need, and divert inevitable food waste from landfills through recycling.  The collaboration between the federal agencies and the FWRA is intended to further the Winning on Reducing Food Waste Federal Interagency Strategy of the EPA, USDA, and FDA.  According to the MOU, the parties intend to share best practices on food waste reduction, collaborate on industry education efforts to reduce food waste, and encourage “safe and effective food donation” through the promotion of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Act, a 1996 federal statute encouraging food donation by limiting liability risks.   

From National Ag Law Experts: 
Penn State Research:
Sam Sholtis Malaria parasite lives on the edge (October 31, 2019)

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture:

Pennsylvania Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
Department of Agriculture

Department of Environmental Protection

Delaware River Basin Commission

Pennsylvania Legislature
H.B.1085 “An Act repealing the act of June 22, 1935 (P.L.414, No.182), known as the State Personal Property Tax Act.” Presented to the Governor (October 29, 2019)
S.B.147 “An Act amending Title 34 (Game) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in Pennsylvania Game Commission, further providing for accountability; and, in hunting and furtaking, further providing for hunting on Sunday prohibited and for trespass on private property while hunting and providing for hunting on Sunday without written permission.” Passed in House (October 30, 2019)
S.B.350 “An Act amending Titles 3 (Agriculture), 18 (Crimes and Offenses) and 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, providing for adult-use cannabis and establishing the Adult-Use Cannabis Grant Program and the Adult-Use Cannabis Fund; in criminal history record information, further providing for expungement; in sentencing, providing for commutation and dismissal of cannabis-related offenses; and imposing penalties.” Referred to Agriculture and Rural Affairs (October 31, 2019)
H.B.188 “An Act providing for property owner's bill of rights statement.” Laid on table, House (October 30, 2019)
H.B.827 “An Act designating certain activity by the Delaware River Basin Commission as the exercise of the power of eminent domain that entitles the owners of the property in question to appropriate and just compensation.” Removed from table in House (October 29, 2019)

Federal Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices:
USDA - Agricultural Marketing Service
“Establishment of a Domestic Hemp Production Program,” Interim Final Rule (October 31, 2019). 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Environmental Protection Agency
“Isotianil; Pesticide Tolerances,” Final Rule (November 1, 2019). 

Farm Credit Administration

Fish and Wildlife Service

Food and Drug Administration

Food and Nutrition Service

Forest Service

Geological Survey

International Trade Administration

Susquehanna River Basin Commission
“Commission Meeting,” Notice (November 6, 2019)

Wage and Hour Division
“Fluctuating Workweek Method of Computing Overtime,” Proposed Rule (November 5, 2019). 

Workers Compensation Programs Office

U.S. House Agriculture Committee Actions: 
H.R.4895 “CFTC [Commodity Futures Trading Commission] Reauthorization Act of 2019” Introduced, Referred to Committee (October 29, 2019). 
H.R.4902 “ARPA [Advanced Research Projects Agency]-Terra Act of 2019,” Introduced, Referred to Committee (October 29, 2019).
H.R.4909 “CFTC [Commodity Futures Trading Commission] Cost-Benefit Analysis Improvement Act,” Introduced, Referred to Committee (October 29, 2019). 
H.R.4874 “Rebuild Rural America Act of 2019,” Introduced, Sponsor introductory remarks (October 30, 2019). 
H.R.4930 “To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide for a lifetime National Recreational Pass for any veteran with a service-connected disability,” Introduced, Referred to Committees (October 30, 2019). 
H.Con.Res.71 “Urging all nations to outlaw the dog and cat meat trade and to enforce existing laws against such trade,” Introduced, Referred to Committees (October 31, 2019). 

U.S. Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry Committee Actions: 
S.2732 “A bill to amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to establish the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Terra, and for other purposes,” Read twice and referred to committee (October 29, 2019). 
S.2744 “A bill to amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to modify requirements for a meat food product of cattle to bear a "Product of U.S.A." label, and for other purposes,” Read twice and referred to committee (October 30, 2019). 
S.2752 “A bill to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to improve program requirements, and for other purposes,” Read twice and referred to committee (October 30, 2019). 
S.2760 “A bill to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to enhance direct certification under the school lunch program,” Read twice and referred to committee (October 31, 2019). 

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks:

Connect with us on FacebookEvery week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Want to get updates, but prefer to listen?  Check out the Agricultural Law PodcastWe can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.

Review last month’s biggest legal developments in agriculture in the October 2019 Agricultural Law BriefIf you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—April 27, 2017

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney and Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

ACRE: PA Attorney General Launches New Online Resource
On April 21, 2017, a new Agriculture, Communities and Rural Environment (ACRE) Act 38 resource page debuted on the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General’s (OAG) website.  Enacted in 2005, the main purpose of ACRE is to protect Pennsylvania’s “normal agricultural operators from unauthorized local regulation.” Accordingly, under ACRE, OAG is empowered to: (1) review local ordinances to determine conflicts with State law; and (2) to bring legal action against local government units for unauthorized local regulations that prohibit or limit normal agricultural operations.  OAG’s new resource page: (1) provides a link to a brochure describing ACRE; (2) lists resources pertaining to 2017 requests for OAG ordinance review; and (3) provides information detailing how agricultural operators can submit written requests for OAG ordinance reviews.  For more information on ACRE, please visit the Center’s ACRE/Pennsylvania Act 38 library guide.

PA Apple Growers Approve New Apple Program
On April 26, 2017, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture released a statement announcing the  approval of the new Pennsylvania Apple Program. The new program replaces the Pennsylvania Apple Marketing Program (PAMP) which will expire next month. Pennsylvania apple growers will be assessed "five cents ($.05) per harvested bushel of apples sold for fresh market use and one cent ($.01) per harvested bushel of apples sold or accepted for processing." The funds will be used for membership obligations, research, consumer education, and administrative activities. 

Senate Confirmation: Sonny Perdue Confirmed as New Secretary of Agriculture
On April 24, 2017, by a vote of 87-11, the U.S. Senate confirmed Sonny Perdue to be the new U.S. Secretary of Agriculture.  Following the confirmation, Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Chairman Pat Robert (R-Kan.) issued the following statement regarding the former Georgia Governor:
“I’m pleased that the U.S. Senate was able to work in a bipartisan fashion to confirm Governor Perdue,” Roberts said. “I have faith that Governor Perdue will put the needs of farmers and ranchers first, and I know that rural America is thankful to have such a qualified Agriculture Secretary on their side.”

White House Releases Executive Order on Agriculture 
On April 25, 2017, the White House released the Presidential Executive Order on Promoting Agriculture and Rural Prosperity in America. The executive order creates the Interagency Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity.  The purpose of the task force is to "identify legislative, regulatory, and policy changes to promote in rural America agriculture, economic development, job growth, infrastructure improvements, technological innovation, energy security, and quality of life..." The order requires the members of the Task Force to submit a report to the president within 180 days recommending legislative and policy changes.

Dairy: USDA Requests Comment on Proposed California Federal Milk Marketing Order
On April 21, 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published notice in the Federal Register of a request for public comment regarding the Proposed California Federal Milk Marketing Order; producer ballots (82 FR 18721).  According to USDA AMS, the “document invites comments on the proposed ballots to be used in conducting a referendum to determine whether the issuance of a Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) regulating the handling of milk in California is favored by producers and cooperative associations.” Comments must be received by June 20, 2017.

COOL: Italy Requires Country of Origin Labeling on Dairy Products
On April 23, 2017, the European Supermarket Magazine (ESM) reported that Italy has made mandatory the labeling of products containing milk and milk derivatives.  According to ESM, “[i]f the milk has been produced, packaged and processed in Italy, the label will state: ‘Origin of Milk: Italy.’" ESM stated that “[i]f the packaging and processing phases taking place in several countries, other than Italy, the label will say: ‘Milk from EU Countries’, ‘Milk Conditioned or Processed in EU Countries’ or ‘Milk Conditioned or Processed in Non-EU Countries’”.

Census Data: USDA to Hold Meeting on Publication of Farm Operator Demographics
On April 20, 2017, The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) announced the scheduling of an expert panel meeting “to consider questions surrounding publication of farm operator demographic data obtained through the 2017 Census of Agriculture.” Planned for May 16-17, 2017, the panel meeting will discuss “questions about NASS’s publication of 2017 Census of Agriculture farm operator demographic data including:
  • What demographic data will NASS publish on persons involved in making decisions for the farm or ranch operation?
  • What new tables and data presentations are needed to publish data from the 2017 Census of Agriculture decision-making questions?
  • How does NASS address publications in light of the specific change from single principal operator in previous censuses of agriculture to multiple persons responsible for decisions in the 2017 Census of Agriculture?”
Pennsylvania Legislation:
  • Senate Agriculture and Rural Affairs: SB 632 (Grain Dealer Bonding Act)
  • Senate Environmental Resources and Energy: SB 645 (Increased Penalties - Solid Waste Violations)
  • House Environmental Resources and Energy: HB 1256 (Moving DEP Farm Permitting to SCC)
Pennsylvania Actions and Notices:
AgLaw HotLinks:

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive AgLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.

For a comprehensive summary of daily judicial, legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food, visit The Ag & Food Law Blog.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Agricultural Law Weekly Review—October 13, 2016

Written by M. Sean High – Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent, local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to agriculture:

Zoning: Court Rules Poultry Processing Included in Ordinance’s Definition Agriculture
On October 4, 2016, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania determined that Paradise Township (Township), York County, Pennsylvania must permit a commercial poultry processing facility under the Township Zoning Ordinance’s (Ordinance) definition of agriculture (Balady Farms, LLC, v. Paradise Township, No. 171 C.D. 2016).  The court stated that the Ordinance defines agriculture as “[a]n enterprise that is actively engaged in the commercial production and preparation for market or use of…livestock and livestock products…[and that] livestock specifically includes poultry.” According to the court, the “proposed addition of a chicken processing facility for chickens raised and bred on the farm…falls squarely within the Township’s definition of ‘agriculture’ and, thus, is permitted in the Township’s [Rural Conservation] District.” The court asserted that this interpretation of agriculture is consistent with Pennsylvania’s Municipalities Planning Code, Right to Farm Act, and Agricultural Communities and Rural Environment Act (ACRE) which are intended to provide statutory protect for the Commonwealth’s agricultural operations. 

Animal Welfare: FSIS Proposal to hold Livestock Transporters and Haulers Liable for Abuse
On October 7, 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued an advance copy of a document submitted to the Office of the Federal Register entitled Inhumane Handling of Livestock in Connection with
Slaughter by Persons Not Employed by the Official Establishment (Docket No. FSIS-2016-0004).  The document announces FSIS’s “intent to hold livestock owners, transporters, haulers and other persons not employed by an official establishment responsible if they commit acts involving inhumane handling of livestock in connection with slaughter when on the premises of an official establishment.”  FSIS stated that “[t]he Agency intends to initiate civil or criminal action, in appropriate circumstances, against individuals not employed by an official establishment, if these individuals handle livestock inhumanely in connection with slaughter when on the official premises.”

Labor:  EEOC Settles Disability Discrimination Lawsuit with Harrison Poultry
On October 4, 2016, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a press release announcing that the agency had reached a settlement agreement with Harrison Poultry, Inc., regarding alleged employment disability discrimination at the company’s Bethlehem, Georgia poultry hatchery.  According to the press release, EEOC filed suit in 2014 charging that Harrison Poultry violated federal law when it failed to provide a manager with a reasonable accommodation for his disability and instead fired him.  As part of the settlement, Harrison Poultry will pay the employee $100,000 and adopt an employee accommodation policy consistent with the American with Disabilities Act.

Litigation: EPA Announces Complaint and Settlement Regarding Alleged Violations of Renewable Fuel Standard
On October 4, 2016 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a press release announcing that the agency and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) had “filed a complaint against NGL Crude Logistics, LLC and Western Dubuque Biodiesel, LLC and a settlement with Western Dubuque to address alleged violations of the Renewable Fuel Standard.”  According to EPA, “[t]he complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, alleges that NGL entered into a series of transactions with Western Dubuque in 2011 that resulted in the generation of approximately 36 million invalid renewable identification numbers (RINs)… [which] are credits created when a company produces qualifying renewable fuel and can be traded or sold to refineries and importers to use for compliance with renewable fuel production requirements.” EPA stated that “[u]nder the settlement, Western Dubuque has agreed to pay $6 million to resolve alleged Renewable Fuel Standard program violations for generating RINs for renewable fuel that was produced using unapproved feedstocks and production processes.  According to EPA, “[t]he consent decree does not resolve any claims against NGL.”

Friday, June 10, 2016

ACRE Update: Latest Attorney General Report Now Available

The Penn State Center for Agricultural and Shale Law has posted the 2015 ACRE Report from the Pennsylvania Attorney General on the Center’s ACRE/Pennsylvania Act 38 webpage.  Entitled Tenth Annual Report ofthe Attorney General to the General Assembly Pursuant to Section 318 of Act 38 of2005 “ACRE” Agriculture, Communities and Rural Environment, the report provides an update of the Attorney General’s 2015 handling of requests for review of local ordinances pursuant to ACRE/Pennsylvania Act 38.

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

PA Township Corrects Right to Farm Violation

Written by Tyler R. Etter

On August 20, 2015, Pennsylvania’s Mount Joy Township (Adams County) amended a zoning ordinance that was found to be in violation of the state’s Right to Farm Act. Review of the ordinance was first requested in March of 2014, with a finding of violations in September.


The Pennsylvania Right to Farm Act is designed to protect normal agricultural operations from local regulations that exceed the state’s regulations on activities. The ordinance in question forbade farmers from using on-site slaughtering operations. Further, the ordinance required 50 acres minimum for a farm-related business, well in excess of the state’s requirement of 10 acres.


In May of 2015, the Attorney General Kathleen Kane sent a letter of recommendations to the township to correct the violations of the Act, which the township appeared to have taken into consideration for the revisions. The revisions consisted of the township adopting the definition of “normal agricultural operations” as used by the Act. Second, the revisions allowed for the processing and sale of poultry on a farm, originally not permitted, which gave rise to the review of the ordinance.

Everett Ramsburg, the farmer that initially requested the review, stated that he doesn’t believe that the township would have acted without the pressure applied by the attorney general. Susan Smith, the township solicitor, denied that the Attorney General’s letter was in direct relation to the changes made to the ordinance, but stated that the specifics “may have been influenced” by the letter.

Friday, July 20, 2012

Commonwealth Court Grants Attorney General Partial Summary Judgment in ACRE Challenge


On July 17, 2012, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania granted the State’s Attorney General partial summary judgment on two ACRE challenges to a Locust Township ordinance.  The Court found:  (1) that small farmers, currently exempt under state law, were improperly required to submit and implement emergency and response nutrient management plans, and (2) local water requirements were in excess of state law.  The Court denied summary judgment as to the Attorney General’s remaining claims and counts. 



To read the Courts opinion in its entirety, pleas click the link below:

Commonwealth v. Locust Township

Written by M. Sean High, Research Assistant
Penn State Law, Agricultural Law Center

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Commonwealth Court Denies Packer Township Summary Judgment in ACRE Challenge


On July 12, 2012, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania rejected a motion for summary judgment brought by Packer Township in response to an ACRE challenge filed by the state Attorney General.  The Attorney General claimed that a Packer Township sludge ordinance was in violation of ACRE because it interfered with normal agricultural operations, and was unauthorized and preempted by state law.  Packer Township responded to the Attorney General with a motion for summary judgment asserting: (1) ACRE was unconstitutional and violated the rights of local residents to self-government; and (2) the Attorney general was prevented from bringing an action because the challenge to the local ordinance did not involve an affected complainant.  In the alternative, the Township’s motion requested partial summary judgment to have the ordinance’s ban on corporate sludging and community bill of rights removed from the Attorney General’s challenge.  Ultimately, the Court denied the Township’s motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment. 



To read the full Commonwealth Court opinion, please click the link below:


Written by M. Sean High, Research Assistant
Penn State Law, Agricultural Law Center

Monday, July 9, 2012

Commonwealth Court Rejects ACRE and Right to Farm Challenge to Township Ordinance

On June 27, 2012, in an unreported opinion, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court rejected post-trial motions and upheld a ruling that a Montgomery County municipality’s ordinance did not violate the Agriculture, Communities and Rural Environment Act (ACRE) and the Right to Farm Law (RFL). Boswell v. Skippack Twp., No. 389 M.D. 2006. ACRE provides farmers with a process to challenge local ordinances that are believed to be unauthorized due to existing state law, while RFL protects normal agricultural operations from nuisance lawsuits and ordinances. At trial, tree farmers James and Paula Boswell unsuccessfully challenged a Skippack Township ordinance precluding their use of a loud, high-pitched sound device designed to protect crops from deer damage. The Boswells claimed the decision was incorrect because evidence presented at trial proved their use of the sound device was a normal agricultural practice protected under ACRE and RFL.  The Commonwealth Court found no identifiable error in the original determination that use of the sound device was not a normal agricultural practice.  For more information on these agricultural statutes, please visit the Agricultural Law Center's ACRE Resource Area and Pennsylvania Right to Farm Act Resource Area.


Written by M. Sean High, Research Assistant
Penn State Law, Agricultural Law Center