Written by: M. Sean High (Staff Attorney)
The following information is an update of recent
local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to
agriculture:
Animal Welfare: SCOTUS Denies Challenge to
Massachusetts Animal Law
On January 7, 2019, the U.S.
Supreme Court denied a petition brought by 13 state attorneys general challenging
Massachusetts’s Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act (PFACA) (Docket
No. 22O149). PFACA prohibits the
confinement of certain poultry, caves, and hogs “in a cruel manner” within Massachusetts. The law also prohibits the selling within
Massachusetts of shell eggs, whole veal meat, or whole pork meat that has been produced
from animals “confined in a cruel manner.” The attorneys general had alleged
that by attempting to regulate farming in other states, PFACA violates the
Commerce Clause. PFACA is scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2022.
Animal Welfare: SCOTUS Denies Challenge
to California Egg Law
On January 7, 2019, the U.S.
Supreme Court denied a petition brought by 13 state attorneys general seeking
to block California’s egg law (Docket
No. 22O148). Enacted by voters in
2008, and later modified, the California law requires that eggs sold in the
state may only come from laying-hens that are permitted the ability to lie
down, stand up, fully extending their limbs, and turn around freely. The attorneys general had alleged that the
California law violated the commerce clause and had cost consumers up to $350
million annually since taking effect in 2015.
Animal Welfare: Michigan Gov. Vetoes
Restrictions on Sales of Shell Eggs
On December 21, 2018,
Michigan Governor Rick Snyder vetoed legislation that would have attached animal
confinement restrictions to the sale of shell eggs (SB
660). Under the proposed law, a
business would have been prohibited from knowingly selling shell eggs produced
from hens not housed in compliance with Michigan’s Animal Industry Act (AIA). Accordingly, AIA prohibits the confinement of
veal calves, gestating sows, and egg-laying hens “in a way that prevents them
from lying down, standing up, fully extending their limbs, or turning around
freely.”
Transportation: DOT Exempts Livestock Haulers
from ELD Requirement
On December 21, 2018, the
National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) reported that the U.S. Department of Transportation has exempted livestock
haulers from regulations requiring the use of electronic logging devices (ELDs)
in their trucks. According to NPPC, such
ELDs, “record driving time, engine hours, vehicle movement and speed, miles
driven and location information.” Because of the exemption, livestock haulers
may continue use paper logs to record required information. According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, the exemption will remain in effect “until
further notice.”
Packers and Stockyards Act: Court Finds
Withdraw of Farmer Fair Practices Rules Proper
On December 21, 2018, the
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals denied a challenge to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) withdrawing of the Farmer Fair Practices
Rules (Organization for Competitive
Markets v. USDA, No. 17-3723). In 2016, USDA published a interim rule under
the Packers and Stockyards Act (PSA) known as the Farmer Fair Practices Rules
(FFPR). Under the FFPR, USDA was to no
longer require a showing that an unfair practice had harmed the entire market in
order to prove a violation of PSA. Subsequently,
in 2017, USDA withdrew the interim rule.
According to the court, USDA acted properly in its action to withdraw
the interim rule.
Food Labeling: BPI Permitted to Refer to
Lean Finely Textured Beef as “Ground Beef”
On December 28, 2018,
Feedstuffs reported
that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety & Inspection Service
(FSIS) has granted Beef Products Inc. (BPI) permission to refer to its lean
finely textured beef product as “ground
beef.” According to an FSIS spokesperson, the agency “has determined that Beef
Products Inc. product meets the regulatory definition of ground beef under the
law in 9 CFR 319.15(a) and may be labeled accordingly.” Relatedly, in 2012, ABC
News published a series of reports that referred to BPI’s lean finely textured
beef product as “pink slime.” Subsequently, in 2012, BPI closed three
production facilities and filed a defamation lawsuit against ABC News. In June of 2017, the parties settled for an
undisclosed amount.
Food Labeling: Court Rejects Claim that “Almond
Milk” is Mislabeled
On December 20, 2018, the
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s dismissal
of a claim that an almond beverage had been mislabeled as “almond milk” (Painter v. Blue Diamond Growers 2:17-cv-02235). The plaintiff alleged that the almond
beverage should have been labeled as “imitation milk” because the product is
nutritionally inferior to dairy milk. According
to the 9th circuit, no jury would conclude that the product is inferior
under the Food and Drug Administration’s definition of nutritional inferiority (21
C.F.R. § 101.3(e)(4)). Additionally,
the 9th circuit affirmed the lower court’s determination that no “reasonable
consumer would ‘assume that two distinct products would have the same
nutritional content.’”
From
National Ag Law Experts:
“Shutdown
Significantly Impacting IRS and USDA”, Kristine A. Tidgren, The Ag Docket – Iowa
State University Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation (January 4, 2019)
“Government
shutdowns - Who dreamed up this crazy idea?”, Kenneth D.
Ackerman, Ag/FDA Blog – Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC (January 4, 2019)
Pennsylvania
Case Law:
Corsnitz
v. Department of Environmental Protection, No. 450 CD18_1-4-19,
(Commonwealth Court quashed appeal as untimely because it was filed 33 days
after the Environmental Hearing Board issued an order upholding a determination
that a farm’s wetlands had been disturbed without a permit) (Filed January 4,
2018)
Pennsylvania
Actions and Notices:
State Conservation Commission
Pennsylvania
Department of Agriculture:
Penn
State Research:
“A
'bran' new way to preserve healthy food with natural ingredients”
– Penn State News
AgLaw HotLinks:
“So the FDA and USDA will share oversight for
cell-based meat… but what will this mean in practice?” – Food Navigator USA
“Democrats mull strategy to shape WOTUS rewrite” – E&E Daily
“DOL asked to keep H-2A newspaper ad requirement” – Feedstuffs
“Peterson
Elected House Ag Chairman” – The Progressive Farmer
Stay Informed:
Connect with us on Facebook to view our weekly CASL Ledger detailing Center
publications and activities
Visit The Ag & Food Law Blog for a comprehensive summary of daily judicial,
legislative, and regulatory developments in agriculture and food
No comments:
Post a Comment